Live data from Hacker News

Why “blockchain” is BS in 4 slides

twitter.com

121–130 of 225 posts

Re: Why “blockchain” is BS in 4 slides

#121
post #115

I read some of the slides, but they are authored from an emotional standpoint, which makes it difficult to follow ideas and conclusions. Statements like "public blockchain security is a lie", are just not useful. If this content is used at Berkley I'm worried for peoples tuition. I'd expect more depth and logical statements for a presentation at a university.

> Statements like "public blockchain security is a lie", are just not useful.

The good news is the statement you quoted was not made.

> I'd expect more depth and logical statements for a presentation at a university.

The slides contain logic statements, depth, and e.g. historical comparisons.

Since there's some character assassination in this thread (how sad): Nicholas Weaver's credentials can be found here [1].

[1] http://www1.icsi.berkeley.edu/~nweaver/

Re: Why “blockchain” is BS in 4 slides

#124
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> arguments that have been thoroughly debunked Could you give one example of an argument made in the deck which has been "thoroughly debunked"?

High fees are only a problem of PoW blockchains, not of PoS blockchains which are becoming the majority right now.

PoS has other disadvantages which PoW doesn't have.

Re: Why “blockchain” is BS in 4 slides

#126

Isn't he discussing cryptocurrencies in particular rather than blockchain in general? There are many uses for blockchain other than as a cryptocurrency. Correct me if I'm wrong - I'm not an expert in blockchain by any means.

>There are many uses for blockchain other than as a cryptocurrency. Name one.

The modelling of value is a prerequisite to the most interesting use cases.

Re: Why “blockchain” is BS in 4 slides

#127
post #121
post #115

I read some of the slides, but they are authored from an emotional standpoint, which makes it difficult to follow ideas and conclusions. Statements like "public blockchain security is a lie", are just not useful. If this content is used at Berkley I'm worried for peoples tuition. I'd expect more depth and logical statements for a presentation at a university.

> Statements like "public blockchain security is a lie", are just not useful. The good news is the statement you quoted was not made. > I'd expect more depth and logical statements for a presentation at a university. The slides contain logic statements, depth, and e.g. historical comparisons. Since there's some character assassination in this thread (how sad): Nicholas Weaver's credentials can be found here [1]. [1]…

Sorry, I don't know the author and it shouldn't matter. Still think the slides are made up of emotional trigger words rather then arguments and content, you can grab content like this from random reddit threads. How sad indeed.

Re: Why “blockchain” is BS in 4 slides

#128

Isn't he discussing cryptocurrencies in particular rather than blockchain in general? There are many uses for blockchain other than as a cryptocurrency. Correct me if I'm wrong - I'm not an expert in blockchain by any means.

>There are many uses for blockchain other than as a cryptocurrency. Name one.

Governance (DAO's, Ardent United, Aragon, etc.)

Re: Why “blockchain” is BS in 4 slides

#129
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Kindly elaborate. Which ones? To what extent? What is the state of the art here? This was my only issue with bitcoin when I evaluated it several years ago.

Pretty much all the newer ones, Nano, Iota and Eth probably soon to. There is also a debate to use delegated PoS or a hybrid of PoS and PoW to get both of their upsides with none of tbeir downsides.

> There is also a debate to use delegated PoS or a hybrid of PoS and PoW to get both of their upsides with none of tbeir downsides.

Read: PoS has downsides.

Re: Why “blockchain” is BS in 4 slides

#130

Isn't he discussing cryptocurrencies in particular rather than blockchain in general? There are many uses for blockchain other than as a cryptocurrency. Correct me if I'm wrong - I'm not an expert in blockchain by any means.

>There are many uses for blockchain other than as a cryptocurrency. Name one.

A notary
Post reply on HN