I read some of the slides, but they are authored from an emotional standpoint, which makes it difficult to follow ideas and conclusions. Statements like "public blockchain security is a lie", are just not useful. If this content is used at Berkley I'm worried for peoples tuition. I'd expect more depth and logical statements for a presentation at a university.
The good news is the statement you quoted was not made.
> I'd expect more depth and logical statements for a presentation at a university.
The slides contain logic statements, depth, and e.g. historical comparisons.
Since there's some character assassination in this thread (how sad): Nicholas Weaver's credentials can be found here [1].