Live data from Hacker News

Apple Plans to Release a Cellular-Capable Watch to Break iPhone Ties

bloomberg.com

121–124 of 124 posts

Re: Apple Plans to Release a Cellular-Capable Watch to Break iPhone Ties

#121
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

$10/mo is $120/yr to get access to the shared pool. That's the exact plan available for my iPad. And for extra cheapskate-ness you don't event get one extra GB when you do that. Pay more for less. I didn't know watches were less. I can't find anything on Verizon's site (from a quick glance) that mentions them, only that "tablets and hotspots" are $10/mo. Even at $60 I don't think I'd do it. I might for my iPad, but n…

And what's the initial plan cost to get that shared data pool? I pay $30/5GB (then throttled unlimited), so if I have to switch to a $50/month plan for a shared pool and add another $10 for a second device, then we're up to $360/year.

I'm assuming the plan is a sunk cost because I already have the necessary one for my cellphone.

The only question for the watch (or any other device) is the additional fee for that and any extra data I might end up needing.

I think the fact that it cost $20 to put my phone on the network (not including any data costs) is already stupid. But it's too late there.

Re: Apple Plans to Release a Cellular-Capable Watch to Break iPhone Ties

#122
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A real game changer like the watches Samsung has been making for years that already do these things?

Got a model reference? I'm curious

http://www.samsung.com/au/consumer/mobile-phone/wearables/ge...

Was pretty cool to be able to leave your phone at home and still have full 3g coverage, especially when out running/cycling/surfing. Opera mini browser was sufficient for looking things up on the go.

Like others have mentioned, Tizen is a hot mess though. In the end the lack of a spotify app was the main pain point for me. Apple will do well to fill that gap.

Re: Apple Plans to Release a Cellular-Capable Watch to Break iPhone Ties

#123
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are in control of that- doesn't your watch let you configure notifications? My watch is always on mute (vibrate only) and it has only a subset of the notifications that my phone has. My experience is it is less demanding of my attention than my phone.

> doesn't your watch let you configure notifications? Doesn't your phone too? The whole argument reads to me like "to free myself i could just get a feature phone but that would be uncool, so i will buy a smartwatch instead"

I think it's the opposite. If you want a feature phone, you don't want a smartwatch. But if you use your phone a lot, maybe a watch can reduce the friction of some of those tasks. If the laptop can stay in the bag and the phone can stay in the pocket (and the actions are just as fast or faster) then the watch is a win for me.

Do you pull your phone out of your pocket to set timers/alarms? Fire off quick texts? Do you pull your phone out of your purse just to check the time? Gee, why not put all of that on your wrist?

And the point of responding to the GP is, this super low friction doesn't have to mean even more overwhelming interruptions if you don't want it to. You can mute or DND notifications if you want.

Re: Apple Plans to Release a Cellular-Capable Watch to Break iPhone Ties

#124

If you could make calls, respond to messages (any platform), play music from a major music service, and stay up-to-date with the most important notifications, you could basically untether yourself from your phone completely. This would be a real game-changer from a personal health standpoint. People are losing their minds with the current smartphone pandemic. I, personally, would welcome this change. It seems like an…

Android watch phones are ten-a-penny from China. Here's one for the low low price of £47:

https://www.banggood.com/GW05-1_54-Screen-Camera-Smart-Watch...

Enjoy.

Post reply on HN