Earlier quoted context omitted.
Bernstein told the author not to mention their prior conversation in his complaint. The author found this suspicious and filed a complaint with the department secretary instead. You know one thing about the author's mental health: he had panic attacks during a very stressful time in his life. Any psychologist can tell you that this has no bearing on someone's truthfulness. Continuing to speculate about his mental hea…
> Bernstein told the author not to mention their prior conversation in his complaint. No, he wanted to the author to restate his complete complaint, rather than merely reference previous confidential statements.
When ‘he’ll be kept on payroll, somewhere’ is where you are
121–122 of 122 posts
Re: When ‘he’ll be kept on payroll, somewhere’ is where you are
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
i mean those e-mails by Dan you quoted are pretty incriminating themselves
Incriminating in what way? They sounded pretty reasonable to me.
Even something as simple as his insistence that either the crime of rape or the crime of slander has been committed is naive and wrong, and it closely reflects one of the more damning sections from the linked blog post. (The issues are, briefly, that 1) it's not a binary and both or neither could easily be true 2) even if it was a binary result set, the legal system doesn't render innocent verdicts; all it can do is decide if something has been shown beyond reasonable doubt 3) all of that is irrelevant to his role as a supervisor and his responsibility to provide a safe workplace; he has obligations to take actions both before the legal system renders a verdict and regardless of what that verdict actually is.)