Live data from Hacker News

How Nasty Gal Went from an $85M Company to Bankruptcy

news.morningstar.com

121–123 of 123 posts

Re: How Nasty Gal Went from an $85M Company to Bankruptcy

#121
post #72

I'll pick out a thread here: the toxic culture. When businesses fail, it's regarded as obvious that the toxic culture contributed to the downfall. With successful businesses like Uber or some bank you recently read about, it's assumed that somehow these behaviours are what makes the companies profitable. My own theory is that toxic culture is a drain on every company with one, like a parasite on a host organism. Some…

If both successful and failed businesses can have toxic culture, then I think we've eliminated culture being correlated with business success or failure. Allegations to contrary, in either direction, sound more like survivorship bias.

By your reasoning, we can eliminate terminal cancer as being correlated with life and death.

Re: How Nasty Gal Went from an $85M Company to Bankruptcy

#122
post #72

I'll pick out a thread here: the toxic culture. When businesses fail, it's regarded as obvious that the toxic culture contributed to the downfall. With successful businesses like Uber or some bank you recently read about, it's assumed that somehow these behaviours are what makes the companies profitable. My own theory is that toxic culture is a drain on every company with one, like a parasite on a host organism. Some…

If both successful and failed businesses can have toxic culture, then I think we've eliminated culture being correlated with business success or failure. Allegations to contrary, in either direction, sound more like survivorship bias.

[deleted]

Re: How Nasty Gal Went from an $85M Company to Bankruptcy

#123
post #121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If both successful and failed businesses can have toxic culture, then I think we've eliminated culture being correlated with business success or failure. Allegations to contrary, in either direction, sound more like survivorship bias.

By your reasoning, we can eliminate terminal cancer as being correlated with life and death.

Uh, terminal cancer? No, we can't.
Post reply on HN