Live data from Hacker News

Employee #1: Amazon

themacro.com

121–124 of 124 posts

Re: Employee #1: Amazon

#121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"it has definitely been a positive development for my wife and I." Seriously? Just curious... what age range are you in?

Were you asking because of his interests or because of his grammar?

I can't see any grammar error in the remark and this kind of comment does not belong here

Re: Employee #1: Amazon

#122
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But interviewing isn't about asking someone technical questions. It's about whether the candidate can get work done. I'll never understand the massive debate about the effectiveness of work-sample tests -- no questions, just "Here is some work. Can you do it?" I've seen how effective it is. And how many people rebel against it. No idea why. Ego, sometimes. It's unfortunate.

I agree that tests like that can be a great way to determine how effective a candidate might be. I think the same principle applies - if possible, giving everyone the same work sample tests provides a good basis for comparison between candidates.

As long as it remains a secret. Once it's out there it stops being that useful.
Post reply on HN