Live data from Hacker News

I’m Sorry

drcraigwright.net

121–130 of 189 posts

Re: I’m Sorry

#121

The only scenario wherein Craig Wright could actually be Satoshi is if Satoshi had burned his bridges -- in the process of abandoning the Satoshi identity, he had deleted all cryptographic evidence of the identity; all private keys and credentials for online accounts. In that case, if he later (now) decided to assert the identity, then he might be tempted to cobble together fake proof to get his foot in the door far…

People have suggested it's possible that the real Satoshi could have destroyed or not kept the original private key, or it belongs with one of the other, now deceased team members. Is there anything to gain by not admitting to it if this were the case? Even if a message were to be signed with the original key, people suggest that it would still not be proof as it could have been stolen or extorted. It seems there is…

The Satoshi coins can be publicly destroyed so they will never be spent. Transfer them all to an address like 1BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB. This is much more trustworthy than leaving it in doubt whether the coins can ever be recovered or not.

Re: I’m Sorry

#122
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Your skepticism prevented me from providing evidence to allay those concerns".

The thing is if he uses actual proof like the community wanted him to there would no longer be any skepticism. So the only reason to not do it is because you can't do it.

If only Satoshi had created a way to publicly prove ownership of Bitcoins. :(

Re: I’m Sorry

#123

I believe the guy is Satoshi. People were expecting the next Jesus Christ and now everyone's so disappointed that "Satoshi" is just an average geek with human weaknesses - not the messiah everyone expected. Had he started a Unicorn startup, nobody would have even thought to question it, but now that the myth of Satoshi has been blown to astronomic proportions, people refuse to believe that their guru is just a "simpl…

now everyone's so disappointed that "Satoshi" is just an average geek with

He doesn't seem "an average geek." He is very smooth-talking and glad-handing. He also looks much more like the sales people than the technical people at all my places of employment.

Re: I’m Sorry

#125

Forgive me as I'm a newbie to bitcoin and only ever seen it from the outside and watched a few things. I only know who Satoshi is because of the mass amounts of people wanting to know who this mysterious man really is. But my question is, why does it matter if Craig Wright is or isn't? I mean I can understand being upset that he lied about it if he really isn't for attention, but what if he is? The dude is literally…

> what if he is? The dude is literally being ripped apart left and right by everyone and anyone. Because he's the guy who, when asked for ID to prove he's 21 when entering a bar, shows a piece of paper with "Date of birth: 21 years old" sharpied on it, and when the bouncer says "yeah this isn't actual ID" the guy goes "WOE IS ME! IF I GET THIS TREATMENT AT THE DOOR, IMAGINE WHAT THE ACTUAL BAR WOULD BE LIKE! I DO NOT…

best thing I've read all day

Re: I’m Sorry

#128
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I had not cared that much about this, but his actions are exactly what I would have expected from bitcoin's creator. There are some guys who simply do not want to be found. The guy who created Bitcoin is one of them. Making things develop like this simultaneously repairs much of the damage to his anonymity while minimizing the damage to the two guys who put their reputations on the line for him. By acting the way tha…

This is perfectly parodied by: https://twitter.com/RealCraigWright/status/72752133741419315... (PS I tried to upvote you out of invisibility because while I think you are wrong the replies are valuable)

I think this is actually terrific:

https://twitter.com/RealCraigWright/status/72824283201683865...

I must find out who the real Real Craig Wright is at once. This is hilarious.

Re: I’m Sorry

#129

Did anyone notice his pronunciation of "moniker" on the BBC piece? Needed a second or two to parse "monkier". Before seeing the weight of evidence both sides of the argument, this awkward language was my first whiff of BS. Just me?

noticed that too, maybe he's dyslexic?
Post reply on HN