Re: EU hits Google with second antitrust charge #121 Post by scholia » Mon, Apr 25, 2016, 10:00 PM UTC cdibona wrote: post #120 cdibona wrote: post #119 Earlier quoted context omitted. I agree, obviously. Lemme look into it. Oh, derp, I was thinking of something else. That makes a lot more sense (that We'd trademark) ;-) No probs. Thanks for checking.