Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not sure that your argument is a false dichotomy, but it smells of logical fallacy to me. Using the pathological case to prove your point rather than a more likely case is disingenuous at best. I'm talking about people trying to make an honest living, and having to deal with nests of vipers while trying get reasonably compensated. If market is 104k, don't offer me 52k salary + 52k bonus, because I have to say I m…
Disproof by counter example is not disingenuous. I pointed out that what vampirechicken wrote was clearly wrong then tried to get at the heart of the issue. I did not say to count each dollar of maximum bonus (or even expected bonus) as the same value as a dollar of salary, in fact I said the opposite. The value of a bonus is the expected value minus the cost of volatility. You correctly point that you should also su…
In my case, a bonus is extra pay, usually tied to performance (individual or corporate), while yours appears to be 'another category of compensation for work done.'