Live data from Hacker News

The New Linode Cloud: SSDs, Double RAM and much more

blog.linode.com

111–120 of 289 posts

Re: The New Linode Cloud: SSDs, Double RAM and much more

#111
VPSBench result:

Before

-------

  CPU model:  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           L5520  @ 2.27GHz
  Number of cores: 8
  CPU frequency:  2266.788 MHz
  Total amount of RAM: 988 MB
  Total amount of swap: 255 MB
  System uptime:   8 days, 12:03,
  I/O speed:  69.9 MB/s
  Bzip 25MB: 8.96s
  Download 100MB file: 47.2MB/s
After

------

  CPU model:  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz
  Number of cores: 2
  CPU frequency:  2800.086 MHz
  Total amount of RAM: 1993 MB
  Total amount of swap: 255 MB
  System uptime:   2 min,
  I/O speed:  638 MB/s
  Bzip 25MB: 5.10s
  Download 100MB file: 146MB/s
Test: https://github.com/mgutz/vpsbench

Re: The New Linode Cloud: SSDs, Double RAM and much more

#113
post #40
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

5c a month savings is worth keeping your Linode on old hardware with 512MB of ram?!??!?

The stuff I have there (mostly lightly-trafficked PHP sites) is not memory-intensive. Why rent a 3000 sq ft office when I only need a 1500 (or even 750) sq ft one? And yes, if I could halve ($20 -> $10) my monthly cost, it would most definitely be welcome.

If you're that cost sensitive, move to Digital Ocean. They have a better deal.

Re: The New Linode Cloud: SSDs, Double RAM and much more

#114

These upgrades are impressive but they are a bit too late to the game. DO still has these advantages besides the cheap monthly price: - DO has excellent and easy to understand API - Step by step guides on setting up and running anything - Minimal and simple To entice me, it's no longer just a matter of price, DO has extra value added, largely due to their simplicity.

You mean like linode.com/api/ and library.linode.com?

Re: The New Linode Cloud: SSDs, Double RAM and much more

#115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

tl;dr: If you had 40 VMs on 8 cores before, you have 10 on 2 cores now. It is the same ratio of VMs:Cores but with stronger processors. Long version: "If you take the upgrade, you inherit the new plan specs, vcpus and all. We’ve greatly reduced the contention on these new machines compared to our old structure, and in testing this new arrangement provides much more consistent CPU time with less potential for steal. W…

Makes a lot of sense. If your hosts have, say, dual 4-way CPUs, and you're giving your VMs 8 vCPUs, then a single VM can execute per clock cycle since a VM needs all of it's vCPUs made available to the guest OS. With 8 VMs, that means one VM is executing every 8th clock cycle. If you "downgrade" those VMs to 2 vCPUs, then 4 VMs can execute per clock cycle, and that VM can now execute every other clock cycle instead o…

If your hosts have, say, dual 4-way CPUs, and you're giving your VMs 8 vCPUs, then a single VM can execute per clock cycle since a VM needs all of it's vCPUs made available to the guest OS.

This seems wrong to me. We're talking about virtualization; technologically, it is absolutely feasibly to have only one physical CPU running a VM even if the VM sees multiple virtual CPUs. And it seems like having this capability in virtualization software from the very beginning is really a no-brainer.

Evidence for your claim, please ;-)

Re: The New Linode Cloud: SSDs, Double RAM and much more

#116

Why do I pay Linode $20/month instead of paying DO $5/month(1)? Because Linode treats their servers like kittens (upgrades, addons/options, support), and DO treats their servers like cattle. There's nothing wrong with the cattle model of managing servers. But I'm not using Chef or Puppet, I just have one server that I use to put stuff up on the internet and host a few services. And Linode treats that one solitary ser…

I don't see that distinction at all. Both Linode and DO provide persistent local storage. Both let you resize your server. And now, they're competitive on price; Linode even has hourly billing. Granted, DO has lower-end plans than Linode. But I don't see any indication that DO treats servers as disposable or fungible whereas Linode doesn't.

Re: The New Linode Cloud: SSDs, Double RAM and much more

#117
post #53
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is not true. Linode allow you to attach additional IPs to your Linode at $1/month, for example, I have one Linode which has 6 IPs attached for only $25/month. I still can't find a company has this kind of flexibility.

Right, but they provide additional IP addresses only if you can provide evidence that you need them (e.g., SSL certs).

Don't almost all web servers/browsers use SNI now? I don't see why you'd need multiple IPs for running multiple SSL sites nowadays. I have done multiple SSL sites on one IP for years.

Re: The New Linode Cloud: SSDs, Double RAM and much more

#120
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What if you want to have several tiny boxes? For example, if you want to host a mail server as a separate box for security, that's another $20/month. Or what if you need to use a different Linux distro for something? Another $20/month. A few examples like that add up fast.

Containers, e.g. through Docker, are good for that kind of thing.

Not with the tiny amounts of memory offered at that price. 2GB is very easy to burn through in short order. Anything less than 8 feels really claustrophobic.

I've always needed memory more than disk. Really wish I could pay some of these providers just for a one off increase of a few extra gigs of memory without tiering up which includes an entirely higher level of storage that I will not ever use.

Post reply on HN