Live data from Hacker News

Inside the Soviet Army (1982)

militera.lib.ru

111–116 of 116 posts

Re: Inside the Soviet Army (1982)

#111
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I hope your research leads to the correct conclusion that trying to force people into equality leads to the use of force to stop dissent, and leads people to flee or campaign against it. Socialism ends in death and misery, every single time . At this point death and misery is a feature, not a bug that can be fixed.

> Socialism ends in death and misery, every single time. Leninism and its descendents might, but every country in the developed West -- where the 19th Century socialists criticism of capitalism was focussed, and whose conditions their program was largely designed for -- adopted, between the late 19th and mid-20th centuries, a substantial portion of the socialist program, and its generally not ended in "death and mise…

I don't agree with that at all.

For a start, socialism goes back further than Marx. The defining characteristic of socialism is the abolition of ownership of private property. Socialism, in the Marxian view, was what was going to arise given the inevitable collapse of capitalism. Everywhere this has been tried, it has ended in death and misery.

The creation of a welfare state is not socialism. It's not even close, unless you want to do some post-hoc rebranding.

Re: Inside the Soviet Army (1982)

#112
post #58
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I hope your research leads to the correct conclusion that trying to force people into equality leads to the use of force to stop dissent, and leads people to flee or campaign against it. Socialism ends in death and misery, every single time . At this point death and misery is a feature, not a bug that can be fixed.

i'd like to hear more about this, exactly how horribly miserable would you end up if you have trillions and you would be forced to give up 99% of your wealth?

The loss of wealth is one thing. The loss of freedom to pursue your own lifes choices would be worse. Add to that the loss of the ability to leave and find a different society that suited your tastes - well, that would be a very miserable existence indeed.

Re: Inside the Soviet Army (1982)

#113
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>I'd love it if this was available on kindle or a paperback. I can mail you a copy in Russian (: If there is one in a local book store, not sure Rezun is popular currently.

please do, although it will take me forever to read with a Eng-Rus dictionary. Challenge accepted.

No ISA, sorry. Here's what I can get. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7610280/WP_20140415_001.... https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7610280/WP_20140415_003.... BTW your defector is much more known here than ours. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7610280/WP_20140415_002....

Re: Inside the Soviet Army (1982)

#114
post #90

Author of this book has committed treason and famous for his pseudo-historical books, that usually paint USSR in blackest colors possible. No serious historian in Russia takes his works seriously. So I'd question anything that written in the book.

False. - anybody went along with Soviet Union dissolution technically committed treason - he is not a professional historian, and it shows. However majority of his theories have been confirmed by professional historians, such as Solonin ( http://www.solonin.org/en ), Hoffman ( http://www.amazon.com/Stalins-War-Extermination-1941-1945-Do... ), Danilov, Gorkov, etc

Ha-ha, professional historians. Solonin wrotes very much false too. See comments about his book: http://awas1952.livejournal.com/58827.html

Re: Inside the Soviet Army (1982)

#115

"It is, in fact, impossible to reach the speeds of which the MIG-25 is capable using titanium: yet the Soviet designers had managed to build this, the fastest combat aircraft in the world, from ordinary steel. " Right... MiG-25, Mach-2.8. All steel. SR-71, Mach-3.5. Uses titanium for 85% of its structure.

Combat aircraft. SR-71 is a spy plane.

The SR-71 and the MiG-25 were originally envisioned for exactly the same role: next-gen high speed, high altitude interceptors. We made a decision that missiles would fill the niche better, and the SR-71 became a recon platform, but it's roots are still in combat.

Re: Inside the Soviet Army (1982)

#116
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>I'd love it if this was available on kindle or a paperback. I can mail you a copy in Russian (: If there is one in a local book store, not sure Rezun is popular currently.

please do, although it will take me forever to read with a Eng-Rus dictionary. Challenge accepted.

ping
Post reply on HN