Earlier quoted context omitted.
I imagine 100 years ago, before terrorism, before the TSA, before the NSA snooped on our phone calls or Hacker News posts, before all of this... I imagine there was a guy who wanted to do something, got stopped by police for a couple of questions, and got agitated by the hassle and it turned into something bigger. Now 100 years ago, that guy couldn't write a blog post about it and get worldwide attention. But then ag…
That's an extraordinarily shitty excuse.
> These events include Mr. Mukerjee becoming further agitated and aggressive after testing positive for explosives, as well as him repeatedly reaching for his not-yet-manually-searched bag.
> However,multiple statements by TSA personnel reference Mr. Mukerjee repeatedly grabbing for his bag after he was told not to touch it.
> While false positives are not unusual for ETD, it is unusual a person and their items could fail so many times using different testing equipment.
What would you have done in a situation like this, when people's lives are at stake and it's your fault if something goes wrong and someone gets hurt?