Earlier quoted context omitted.
Did you really just say that it's easier to write a large number of windows-only programs than it is to either: a) fix the websites that have ActiveX dependencies b) modify a single web-browser to support ActiveX like IE6 used to If true, ... wow.
What I meant was that the large number of currently Windows-only Chinese desktop applications will not be the biggest obstacle to Chinese users adobting Ubuntu, because they can be ported, and Canonical is working with the Chinese government to port the most popular ones ahead of time. The number of Chinese websites out there with ActiveX dependencies is probably much greater, and you can't really "port" a website. G…
Ubuntu tapped by China for national operating system
111–118 of 118 posts
Re: Ubuntu tapped by China for national operating system
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wait, I'm British. You were talking about Britain. Why did we suddenly switch to the USA? Also, half of your rebuttals are inaccurate and half are not comparable in the slightest. No, there is no western version of the horrors of "Tank Man". A lot of the Chinese i've spoken to do not even know this happened, and the other half refuse to see it as a problem. You're a textbook example. The USA isn't the greatest countr…
> Wait, I'm British. You were talking about Britain. Why did we suddenly switch to the USA? Also, half of your rebuttals are inaccurate and half are not comparable in the slightest. Really? I'd like to see how. China is mostly a country that hasn't attacked or bothered anyone. Tibet and Taiwan are disputed areas next to mainland China -- not some remote countries they decided to invade and exploit as colonies. Unlike…
I think you two are comparing two evils. It doesn't matter which empire is the lesser of the two evils - ALL empires should be scorned. Why don't we all agree on this fact? The next thing we should be persuaded on is the democratization and decentralization of these two empires.
Re: Ubuntu tapped by China for national operating system
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Also, half of your rebuttals are inaccurate and half are not comparable in the slightest. Sounds comparable to me. > A lot of the Chinese i've spoken to do not even know this happened, and the other half refuse to see it as a problem. There's a fair bit of obliviousness in the US as well. > There is no suppression of readily available information (blocked search queries, etc). Wikileaks? Alteration of Google Earth…
It is universal in theme, sure. Not magnitude. Google Earth alterations of military installations != great firewall. Show me a military that's cool with open aerials of their bases. The U.S. just got lucky that they had a bit of jurisdiction over the first company to do it. Don't act as if it's asymmetric due to other nations having a larger conscious, it's not. It's just a simple lack of power.
Sure, we're bad. They're worse!
Re: Ubuntu tapped by China for national operating system
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
It has nothing to do with the Chinese international students being bright (which they generally are) or malleable (which they're not - they're just studying machines). It has to do with the fact that there are a ton of Chinese websites that only work in IE.
That is a good point, although I think it's more of Windows-only programs like PPS, a TV and movie streaming app that fills the Netflix void, except it's free so everyone and their mother uses it
Re: Ubuntu tapped by China for national operating system
#115Leaving aside the normal concerns about collaboration with an authoritarian government, this looks like a really big deal: Ubuntu is now the "reference architecture for standard operating systems" in China. [1] If I understand correctly, this means a flavor of Ubuntu (and Unity, according to the press release) will be used by hundreds of millions of people within the next decade, far surpassing the worldwide market s…
Unlikely. Most people in China use pirated versions of Windows, so they'll keep doing that. Maybe the governments will require the use of this brand of Ubuntu, but that's it.
Re: Ubuntu tapped by China for national operating system
#116Re: Ubuntu tapped by China for national operating system
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think Singapore is not the best example of a totalitarian dictatorship. Its an elected democracy, low coorruption, high standards of living. But yes it is "partly free" according to EIU its ranked with Hong Kong and Banglesh and a long way above Russia. So I would still say yes, freedom does bring economic benefits. One assumes the more freedom the more benefits. We ought to remember that at the polling stations
> We ought to remember that at the polling stations The polling stations only represent a small part of the problem. You know what I wish we had? A movement of common-sense intellectually honest discussion groups. Groups that are focused on media distortions and facts. Groups that are predicated on the idea that the media and politics is self-interested in promulgating drama and debate beyond what really makes sense.…
What we have in almost all newspapers and tv outlets is not Journalism and when it occassionally is it is not comprehensive, sustained or penetrative
I suspect that in the uk as we may or may not get so e press regulation, we shall find blogging as the protected speech and slowly find local issues becoming driven from local blogs.
It's going to be fun to watch
Re: Ubuntu tapped by China for national operating system
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
Canonical aren't enabling anything. They just repackage open source software (bar their custom themes and Unity). If the Chinese populous don't like any of the governments additions, then those users can grab the binaries / source code directly and roll their own customisations.
If you don't think building a usable linux distro is an enormous amount of work you've never actually tried to do it. Canonical (and the Ubuntu project) is an awful lot more than a few Canonical-originated upstreams.
It's a bit like when people blame ISPs when customers use their services for piracy. The difficulty of setting up an ISP (or distro) is completely irrelevant in this discussion.