Earlier quoted context omitted.
I guess, if I was going to put my CISPA-advocate hat on, which I don't like because it is an ugly hat that I think my cat peed on, I would say this: It is already possible for service providers to do the things CISPA enables them to do. However, under current regulations, it is legally risky for them to do it. Some of what they do incurs legal risk. Some of the legal risks mean that whole companies in some verticals…
Do you think that EFF vs AT&T would have been easier to dismiss, post-CISPA?
Civil Liberties Groups Speak Out Against CISPA in Lead Up to Hearings
111–113 of 113 posts
Re: Civil Liberties Groups Speak Out Against CISPA in Lead Up to Hearings
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
He isn't saying CISPA should be opposed, but rather, additional specific legislation to protect individual's data from being retrieved by the government without due process.
But that is already unlawful.
edit: Specifically, this is a precedent that is a big step in the right direction for this kind of thing, IMO: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5382891
Re: Civil Liberties Groups Speak Out Against CISPA in Lead Up to Hearings
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you think that EFF vs AT&T would have been easier to dismiss, post-CISPA?
No. What part of AT&T's defense involved operational network security? For whatever it's worth: AT&T's complicity in NSA monitoring of overseas traffic involving American citizens was despicable.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/03/consequences-cispas-br...
I don't share their concerns about the "hack back" thing. It's hard to take that seriously.