Amazon to Provide CD Buyers With Cloud-Based MP3s For Free
111–114 of 114 posts
Re: Amazon to Provide CD Buyers With Cloud-Based MP3s For Free
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wish that they'd do this for books. The biggest thing keeping me from buying more ebooks is that they're usually the same price as the physical book - and, in some cases, more expensive than the physical book. At that price, I'd just as soon buy the physical copy. On the other hand, it would be nice to know that, when I buy a physical copy, I also have access to a digital version if needed. In the case of technical…
Already own the physical book? Pirate the ebook.
Wanted to mention O'Reilly though - for $5 and a note of the ISBN number off the back of your book you get the ebook in whatever format you desire, can re-download it as many times as you want in whatever formats, and it'll automatically sync to dropbox.
I've been stocking up on them - it does work really well. I get to carry about all my books (well, not quite), with notes and highlights and i only need to keep physical copies of the books i refer to most often. It's been a bit of a revelation for me.
Re: Amazon to Provide CD Buyers With Cloud-Based MP3s For Free
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wish that they'd do this for books. The biggest thing keeping me from buying more ebooks is that they're usually the same price as the physical book - and, in some cases, more expensive than the physical book. At that price, I'd just as soon buy the physical copy. On the other hand, it would be nice to know that, when I buy a physical copy, I also have access to a digital version if needed. In the case of technical…
In the UK one of the reasons that digital copies don't come with books is that if they did that it would mean that it's now VAT chargeable. Books normally don't have VAT but digital goods do.
Re: Amazon to Provide CD Buyers With Cloud-Based MP3s For Free
#114Why can't they just offer FLAC and eliminate CDs altogether?
Because most people don't want FLAC. It's huge and incompatible with the most popular players for no noticeable benefit to the vast majority of listeners. AIFF or WAV would be much better candidates if we were going down the lossless digital music route because they are more widely compatible (though a 320 kbps mp3 is the most I'll ever need).