Live data from Hacker News

Two Billion Pixel Photo of Mount Everest (can you find the climbers?)

s3.amazonaws.com

111–120 of 176 posts

Re: Two Billion Pixel Photo of Mount Everest (can you find the climbers?)

#111
post #77
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For those looking: 1. Of the 3 mountains, look at the peak of the center one (Lhotse). 2. Below that, the right half is big chunky snow, and the left half is smooth, icey looking snow. 3. Look at the line where the smooth left half meets the chunky right half. - Halfway up that you can find CAMP 3. [You'll see little ant people marching up that centerline - follow them to their tents.] Also once you see CAMP 3, you a…

For anyone who is still looking: http://f.cl.ly/items/3w2j2h0a1a3h0M1K0i3l/ppl.jpg (you can only see the people at max zoom-level, they are really tiny)

I've found this lonely guy http://cl.ly/image/221I0N1x1c1Y

Re: Two Billion Pixel Photo of Mount Everest (can you find the climbers?)

#112
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For those looking: 1. Of the 3 mountains, look at the peak of the center one (Lhotse). 2. Below that, the right half is big chunky snow, and the left half is smooth, icey looking snow. 3. Look at the line where the smooth left half meets the chunky right half. - Halfway up that you can find CAMP 3. [You'll see little ant people marching up that centerline - follow them to their tents.] Also once you see CAMP 3, you a…

Thanks for this explanation, I wouldn't have seen that part otherwise. At first I wasn't sure which peak you meant exactly, but once I picked the right one I found it. None of those little ant people are really climbing though. Also, the resolution should have been much more than a gigapixel to make that part more interesting :) I immediately saw the HUGE tent camp in the front though.

At first glance I thought the tent city was garbage and orange peels. Mind = Blown.

Re: Two Billion Pixel Photo of Mount Everest (can you find the climbers?)

#116
post #89
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are far deadlier mountains out there than Everest. I think the current death rate is around 5%. Annapurna has killed about 35% of the climbers that attempted. It has gotten to the point where there are basically proven (about as much as you can for something so dangerous) methods of getting to the top. "Into Thin Air" is a great book on the journey (the very bad , and the good) to the top.

I always thought about doing Everest if I could ever afford it. You know, one those idle "I'll do that someday thoughts" we all have. Once I hit the "I could afford this" point I started researching Everest...read Into Thin Air, Dark Summit, No Shortcuts to the Top, etc., watched every documentary I could get my hands on, even talked with one of the climbers featured on the Discovery series that featured Russel Brice…

Mountaineering is a great time, but I agree with you about Everest. If you want to do something fun, challenging, and not quite so dangerous or commercialized check out climbing 14ers. Climbing all the ones in the state is a common past time in Colorado. They all have varying degrees of difficulty and depending the peak and time of year you may have a beautiful day climb completely alone.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Colorado_fourteeners

The couple years I lived in CO I managed to get a few done and really enjoyed the experience.

Re: Two Billion Pixel Photo of Mount Everest (can you find the climbers?)

#117

Looks like there's a few on the icefall. Follow the line of garbage, then up and across the fall. The only hard part is dealing with the inverted mouse movement on the interface. Why would they do that???

I came to post that- about the mouse movement. It's absolutely driving me nuts. Makes no sense.

That mouse panning convention has existed for at least 15 years in most web browsers. Click the middle mouse button to activate it in any web browser.

Re: Two Billion Pixel Photo of Mount Everest (can you find the climbers?)

#118
post #41

Looks like there's a few on the icefall. Follow the line of garbage, then up and across the fall. The only hard part is dealing with the inverted mouse movement on the interface. Why would they do that???

For those looking: 1. Of the 3 mountains, look at the peak of the center one (Lhotse). 2. Below that, the right half is big chunky snow, and the left half is smooth, icey looking snow. 3. Look at the line where the smooth left half meets the chunky right half. - Halfway up that you can find CAMP 3. [You'll see little ant people marching up that centerline - follow them to their tents.] Also once you see CAMP 3, you a…

WOW! Definitely stared right at camp 3 for a while unable to find them. They're TINY!

Re: Two Billion Pixel Photo of Mount Everest (can you find the climbers?)

#119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I came to post that- about the mouse movement. It's absolutely driving me nuts. Makes no sense.

That mouse panning convention has existed for at least 15 years in most web browsers. Click the middle mouse button to activate it in any web browser.

Not true at all -- then the view follows the cursor as I move it. On this site, the view moves towards the cursor when I click. Very different.

Re: Two Billion Pixel Photo of Mount Everest (can you find the climbers?)

#120
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For anyone who is still looking: http://f.cl.ly/items/3w2j2h0a1a3h0M1K0i3l/ppl.jpg (you can only see the people at max zoom-level, they are really tiny)

I've found this lonely guy http://cl.ly/image/221I0N1x1c1Y

I don't know but I think that might be two people. That, or he's hugging a small bear. https://www.evernote.com/shard/s3/sh/1d7328b2-960d-4728-b9af...
Post reply on HN