Live data from Hacker News

I used to be excited about new tech, but I rarely am anymore

82mhz.net

111–117 of 117 posts

Re: I used to be excited about new tech, but I rarely am anymore

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you hate e-bikes, or do you hate city planning that treats e-bikes as second-class citizens, and forces them into direct competition with cars and pedestrians?

[flagged]

Please don't post ragebait or wish anyone death on HN. The guidelines make it clear we're trying for something better here. We have to ban accounts that do this repeatedly. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re: I used to be excited about new tech, but I rarely am anymore

#112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Were they wrong?

When I was a kid in the 90s, my grandparents never wanted to get cable television, despite watching a lot of local broadcasts. Their children (and grandchildren) thought they would truly enjoy it: more live sports, history documentaries, and so on. They thought it would be low quality trash. As a birthday gift, my mother tried to give them a lifetime cable subscription so they could see what they were missing. When t…

So your grandparents were caught in the 'Fox News' bubble and as a result of that you state they became 'isolated, paranoid, overtly racist and [hateful]'. Sounds dire...

Have you considered that it may be just as true that you are caught in another bubble - say the 'CNN-MSNBC/MSNOW-ABC-CBS-NYT-WaPo' bubble or something similarly bent and twisted? That as a result from that you have become in the eyes of those outside that bubble 'naive, gullible, overtly anti-western, suicidally empathic and disdainful of those with a different view', especially given that your grandparents are from a different generation which uses different words (and words differently) and has a different frame of reference? That to me seems more likely than that your grandparents have been turned to the dark side by watching cable television.

Re: I used to be excited about new tech, but I rarely am anymore

#113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When I was a kid in the 90s, my grandparents never wanted to get cable television, despite watching a lot of local broadcasts. Their children (and grandchildren) thought they would truly enjoy it: more live sports, history documentaries, and so on. They thought it would be low quality trash. As a birthday gift, my mother tried to give them a lifetime cable subscription so they could see what they were missing. When t…

So your grandparents were caught in the 'Fox News' bubble and as a result of that you state they became 'isolated, paranoid, overtly racist and [hateful]'. Sounds dire... Have you considered that it may be just as true that you are caught in another bubble - say the 'CNN-MSNBC/MSNOW-ABC-CBS-NYT-WaPo' bubble or something similarly bent and twisted? That as a result from that you have become in the eyes of those outsid…

Which one is it? Bubbles are dangerous but not the Fox bubble?

Re: I used to be excited about new tech, but I rarely am anymore

#114
post #108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But look at the rate of it. How many new exciting things between 1950 and 1960? Color TV, jet airplanes, transistors, computers, early programming languages, nuclear power, artificial satellites, polio vaccine, credit cards, microwave oven, Xerox, fax machines. How many new exciting thing between 2010 and 2020? AI, Netfix and crypto? Not sure I should be excited about that last one...

Yeah, but... Transistors existed between 1950 and 1960. But they didn't really set the world on fire until the 1970s. Computers existed in the 1950s, but they didn't explode into businesses until the IBM 360 series, and they didn't go into homes until the 1970s, and not in volume until the 1980s. Xerox existed, but didn't explode until the 1970s. And so on. It is decades from something being invented, to commercial a…

OK, but does any of that invalidate my argument?

Re: I used to be excited about new tech, but I rarely am anymore

#115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So your grandparents were caught in the 'Fox News' bubble and as a result of that you state they became 'isolated, paranoid, overtly racist and [hateful]'. Sounds dire... Have you considered that it may be just as true that you are caught in another bubble - say the 'CNN-MSNBC/MSNOW-ABC-CBS-NYT-WaPo' bubble or something similarly bent and twisted? That as a result from that you have become in the eyes of those outsid…

Which one is it? Bubbles are dangerous but not the Fox bubble?

I don't see how you get this from what I wrote. The grandparent poster only mentioned the 'Fox bubble', I made clear that this is not the only one and that it is likely he was caught in one of the other ones. I neither stated nor implied that it was the only 'non-dangerous' one, that is something out of your own imagination.

Re: I used to be excited about new tech, but I rarely am anymore

#116
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

“I've come up with a set of rules that describe our reactions to technologies: 1. Anything that is in the world when you’re born is normal and ordinary and is just a natural part of the way the world works. 2. Anything that's invented between when you’re fifteen and thirty-five is new and exciting and revolutionary and you can probably get a career in it. 3. Anything invented after you're thirty-five is against the n…

Does not check out. One of the things I was highly excited about was RF communication. It still is. Another thing was LASERs and it still is. Computers also was one of them. But modern media boxes are not exciting. Microcontrollers though, are still exciting.

I know a tall Asian man, that doesn't mean that the average Asian is tall though.

Re: I used to be excited about new tech, but I rarely am anymore

#117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which one is it? Bubbles are dangerous but not the Fox bubble?

I don't see how you get this from what I wrote. The grandparent poster only mentioned the 'Fox bubble', I made clear that this is not the only one and that it is likely he was caught in one of the other ones. I neither stated nor implied that it was the only 'non-dangerous' one, that is something out of your own imagination.

I can see now that my reading was uncharitable. Though I disagree with the last sentence of "not likely". Grandparents becoming FOX zombies is not a rare thing.
Post reply on HN