111–120 of 325 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Even copyrighted information can never be "stolen". It can only copied without authorization.
Stealing is not a word that applies only to physical objects.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Even copyrighted information can never be "stolen". It can only copied without authorization.
Stealing is not a word that applies only to physical objects.
Language is all just sounds and markings. Anything can be redefined to mean anything, and anyone can decide to aggressively assert their preferred definition of a word.
Why they use different models to decode the reasoning content? Can the the model decode it?
I was experimenting a bit how I could block these using an ingress path. GitHub /softcane/hamza
>guys you do know you can just disable thinking, and instead give it a "deep_think" tool, and it will call it with internal CoT reasoning format right?
>gl fixing that
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Stealing is not a word that applies only to physical objects.
Any word can be applied to any concept with any meaning thanks to the fluidity of vernacular. Language is all just sounds and markings. Anything can be redefined to mean anything, and anyone can decide to aggressively assert their preferred definition of a word.
Of course, you can assert that the meaning of "steal" only applies to physical items. You are well within your right to do so. You'd be wrong, but you can do it.