Live data from Hacker News

FCC moves to ban Lidar-equipped foreign drones from US

tomshardware.com

111–120 of 125 posts

Re: FCC moves to ban Lidar-equipped foreign drones from US

#111
post #109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>You are going to need proof for this. Are you asking for proof China is not Communist? It is common knowledge Party Service Centers and State-Directed Industrial Policy support have been active for decades. One may talk with US customs about why industries had anti-dumping levies on China exports. Also, the PRC Party embeds advisors in almost every large successful domestic firm. So businesses couldn't really have '…

>>> Selling products at a loss relying on government $0 labor cost subsidy for years >> You are going to need proof for this. > Are you asking for proof China is not Communist? No, I literally quoted exactly what I'm asking for proof for.

I was not referring to the recently expanded NDRC programs

https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3317637/c...

Nor was it related to forced and or child labor political taboos

https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ilab/reports/child-labor/list-o...

But it was a rather simple multi-year PRC Party labor partnership program for key industries. Very frustrating as I can't remember if it was for foreign owned firms only or not, as "AI" spam is insisting China never existed prior to 6 years ago. I will look into the matter again as time permits in a day or so. =3

Re: FCC moves to ban Lidar-equipped foreign drones from US

#112
post #109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>>> Selling products at a loss relying on government $0 labor cost subsidy for years >> You are going to need proof for this. > Are you asking for proof China is not Communist? No, I literally quoted exactly what I'm asking for proof for.

I was not referring to the recently expanded NDRC programs https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3317637/c... Nor was it related to forced and or child labor political taboos https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ilab/reports/child-labor/list-o... But it was a rather simple multi-year PRC Party labor partnership program for key industries. Very frustrating as I can't remember if it was for foreign owned firms onl…

So basically you made the whole thing up.

Re: FCC moves to ban Lidar-equipped foreign drones from US

#113
post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was not referring to the recently expanded NDRC programs https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3317637/c... Nor was it related to forced and or child labor political taboos https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ilab/reports/child-labor/list-o... But it was a rather simple multi-year PRC Party labor partnership program for key industries. Very frustrating as I can't remember if it was for foreign owned firms onl…

So basically you made the whole thing up.

Which part of the forced unpaid labor noted in the trade policy notice do you think is imaginary?

I can't immediately recall the program name my boss from Procter & Gamble worked under at the time. But it was similar to the XPCC labor programs cited in the provided links.

One can believe whatever BS a naive LLM tells them, but in this case you were wrong. The import levies/fines/bans will stay until folks can provide proof of reasonable, legal, and humane working conditions for all Chinese people. Best of luck with that. =3

Re: FCC moves to ban Lidar-equipped foreign drones from US

#114
post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So basically you made the whole thing up.

Which part of the forced unpaid labor noted in the trade policy notice do you think is imaginary? I can't immediately recall the program name my boss from Procter & Gamble worked under at the time. But it was similar to the XPCC labor programs cited in the provided links. One can believe whatever BS a naive LLM tells them, but in this case you were wrong. The import levies/fines/bans will stay until folks can provide…

None of the links you provided talk about what you claimed at all. Instead they talk about forced labor in other industries. That's terrible and all forced labor - including in US prison system - should be stopped.

But you made very specific allegations about wage subsidiaries for electric motor manufacturer and is zero evidence for that.

Now you are moving the goal posts to random "China bad" talking points.

Re: FCC moves to ban Lidar-equipped foreign drones from US

#115
post #114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which part of the forced unpaid labor noted in the trade policy notice do you think is imaginary? I can't immediately recall the program name my boss from Procter & Gamble worked under at the time. But it was similar to the XPCC labor programs cited in the provided links. One can believe whatever BS a naive LLM tells them, but in this case you were wrong. The import levies/fines/bans will stay until folks can provide…

None of the links you provided talk about what you claimed at all. Instead they talk about forced labor in other industries. That's terrible and all forced labor - including in US prison system - should be stopped. But you made very specific allegations about wage subsidiaries for electric motor manufacturer and is zero evidence for that. Now you are moving the goal posts to random "China bad" talking points.

Not really, but one may read a brief explanation of why there is a long history of anti-dumping mitigation with China exports

https://kingcenter.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj16611/fi...

Sealioning means you no longer had a point to make, bye. =3

Re: FCC moves to ban Lidar-equipped foreign drones from US

#116
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

4k video is worthless compared to LiDAR. You are never going to get sub millisecond dead reckoning from video processing. Previously this required things like extremely expensive, export controlled ring laser gyroscopes (they do not drift and cannot be easily interfered with or jammed like the cheap IMU in your phone) There are many more reasons LiDAR kicks ass but none of them have anything to do with why they are d…

>4k video is worthless compared to LiDAR. You should do some more research into structure-from-motion and get back to us. Lidar is nice for real-time data, but these days anyone can process a 4k stream and get excellent geometry data.

You're not doing that to 4k60 in microsecond timeframes brother, especially not for driftless navigation

Re: FCC moves to ban Lidar-equipped foreign drones from US

#117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

4k video is worthless compared to LiDAR. You are never going to get sub millisecond dead reckoning from video processing. Previously this required things like extremely expensive, export controlled ring laser gyroscopes (they do not drift and cannot be easily interfered with or jammed like the cheap IMU in your phone) There are many more reasons LiDAR kicks ass but none of them have anything to do with why they are d…

> 4k video is worthless compared to LiDAR. You are never going to get sub millisecond dead reckoning from video processing Will America's foes heinously attack the homeland by offering socialistic self-driving vehicles? What exactly the threat model here, that makes Lidar data dangerous? Space-based remote sensing is superior in almost every way.

If I had to reach for something I would have to guess they're attempting to hinder their use in renewables. Generally speaking they are not too popular in weapons because shooting a bunch of lasers out of your nose is not exactly stealthy

Before we had these, wind farms used to have to poach cell phone tower guys to climb up every single one. Had a neighbor who did this, it pays insanely well but my palms sweat just thinking about it.

Re: FCC moves to ban Lidar-equipped foreign drones from US

#118
post #106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Anduril Industries is not a second rate company Then they can compete successfully with non-US companies and protectionist tariffs are useless.

national security > free market capitalism

Go back up the thread and explain how it helps national security. So far there is no explanation of it.

> national security > free market capitalism

Also, claiming 'national security' is an old excuse to do anything. The current administration uses it to justify almost anything. These aren't absolutes - everything that possibly touches on national security isn't justifiable. And free markets are critical to national security - that's what gives the US and others a huge advantage in economic output and innovation.

Re: FCC moves to ban Lidar-equipped foreign drones from US

#119
post #58

Stop manipulating our markets under the guize of national security or protecting Americans. If we need to be protected from bad behavior we need to be protected by all bad behavior regardless of it's origin. Has back doors? Ban it. Has awful security around sensitive data? Ban it. Makes technology available to the masses that is a national security risk? Ban it(if you most). Why give US companies a pass on this? It's…

The idea is to provide protection for incubating a local industry in what's deemed a key strategic sector. But that's not the best way to do it. See what the Jones Act did to US shipbuilding. We should make foreign companies manufacture here, just like China did. It also works as a jobs program and builds up and industrial base and skill, as we've seen with the Japanese automotive sector.

The idea is more nefarious than it. Domestic firms install tracking and backdoors usable by the US government, whereas foreign firms won't.

Re: FCC moves to ban Lidar-equipped foreign drones from US

#120
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> And banning the foreign ones means they can order domestic-made drones to have firmware that prevents them from operating in certain (government) areas, among other things. Yeah because DJI drones are well known for their easy to hack firmware and lacking support for no fly zones..right? And they would openly flaunt any US law making any drones sold or flown the US to obey the NFZs? But wait, that's exactly what DJ…

NFZ was just one example, there's no limit to what they could force other countries' software to do in their domestic versions. That was really the point I was trying to make.

Backdoors and tracking.
Post reply on HN