Live data from Hacker News

Google kills Earth AI generator after one day

twitter.com

111–114 of 114 posts

Re: Google kills Earth AI generator after one day

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

what’s wrong with the name Bard?

It's frustrating when a product has a generic name that returns pages of unrelated search results. It's also frustrating when the name gives no real hint about what it does.

Ah yes, unlike Gemini which explains exactly what it does and has no other matches.

Re: Google kills Earth AI generator after one day

#112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does Reddit do that too? Is it just on the "new" UI? I know TikTok encodes it in an inconspicuous way, the ID in the shared URL just looks like a normal ID but it's different from the bare video ID. Then both of you (I think) get a "Do you know person xyz?" type of notification.

Reddit encodes the whole thing in an opaque blob, giving you a URL like reddit.com/share/ that cannot be transformed into any other format without fetching it.

On a browser, you can strip the share id and post title to create a “clean” old.reddit link, with this pattern: https://old.reddit.com/r/bapcsalescanada/comments/1vd9h0j/

Re: Google kills Earth AI generator after one day

#113
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They are good products, it’s just hard to prevent people from abusing them

“Communism is a good political theory, it’s just hard to prevent people from abusing it.” “Letting everyone out of prison is a good social strategy, it’s just hard to prevent people from abusing it.” “Making all shops operate on the honor system is a good business strategy, it’s just hard to prevent people from abusing it.”

These are really bad examples! Actually you listed 3 things with no underlying value. A more proper example would be a knife, it is a very useful tool and can also be abused. Honestly I would rather live with the risk than in a world without knives. But to each his own.

Re: Google kills Earth AI generator after one day

#114
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They are good products, it’s just hard to prevent people from abusing them

Proper engineering requires observing and working with real-world constraints. Ignoring constraints is a form of magical thinking. One real-world constraint is that end-users won't always do what you intend for them to with the thing you engineered.

I would take that risk in exchange for access to more capabilities but I am understanding most people risk acceptance is lower than mine. Some want to live in a world of rubber.
Post reply on HN