Arrrgh I bet I can't use it on Vertex
Claude Tag
111–120 of 200 posts
Re: Claude Tag
#112No way they announced a new product before commenting on access to Fable/Mythos.
At larger companies like this, there are many parallel product development lines that are mostly independent of each other.
Re: Claude Tag
#113Is this still using Claude Web sessions? Also, has anyone used Claude Web environments to do anything besides stuff with repo access? Like running real environments? SSHing into anything more super powered? Anyone putting real creds into those environments?
ive given it a discord webhook, if that counts
Re: Claude Tag
#114I’d be curious how they’ve solved the attribution/provenance/identity problem here. Are instances of Claude Tag, across channels, sharing the same identity? Can I grant one instance access to a range of AWS roles and another instance access to other roles? During an incident, how do I know which Claude Tag called AWS?
This is explicitly answered in this post: > Think of it as creating separate Claude identities for different uses: everything, including its memories, will stay scoped to the channels defined by the administrators. For example, a model set up for sales work won’t pass on memories to one set up for engineering; nor will it give engineers access to any sales data or tools. More information about provisioning access is…
Not really, and neither does the doc it links to. It explains the difference between a personal agent (that acts as you) and a multiplayer agent (that has its own identity).
But they walk all this back by saying that for PRs in GitHub it uses the upstream Claude for GitHub app - that is one installation of a GH app, which means one identity, one list of repos it can access. In the audit logs it will be impossible to see if it was Claude Tag from Channel Y or Claude Tag from channel X.
Arguably that’s a limitation of the abysmal state of machine identities in GH.
Agent identity and attribution continues to be important, but current systems makes it oh so difficult.
Re: Claude Tag
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
And it sometimes feels like these teams are not talking to each other. Using Claude Design? The way to hand it over to Claude Code is to download a .zip file with the html mockup and some description, which you then have to copy into Claude Code so it can use it.
The latest version of Claude code as of yesterday or day before has Claude design Mcp so you don’t need to do this now. edit: note this may not be official release, and may be unavailable for some users. I saw it show up yesterday listed as available Mcp and used it to view projects in Claude design.
still doesn't feel integrated, like it could have been built by any other company, e.g. Microsoft could have built Microsoft Design and it would look better integrated.
For example, it writes the whole front-end twice, once is claude design and then later it has to read it again and re-implement it in code. Also a lot of stuff (e.g. Claude.md, skill files, etc) are not supported, and they have their own set of ui-design and design systems, which claude code doesn't support.
I think Claude Design is a wonderful product, i'm just pointing that it is an independent product to Claude Code, heck even today it works better with Codex than Claude Code (that is how i use it with my own browser-use agent, i tell it to browse the design in Claude.ai/design and re-implement the design, works much better than downloading the zip file and asking the model to implement in that way.
Re: Claude Tag
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why did you build on OpenClaw?
It's not built on OpenClaw, it uses Pi the harness that powers OpenClaw. We were using the GTM for multi-tenant OpenClaw when there was hype but quickly moved away from it as OpenClaw is a nightmare in terms of security.
Excellent. Now I will take it seriously.
Re: Claude Tag
#117> Today, 65% of our product team’s code is created by our internal version of Claude Tag. Given the reliability and general product quality of the Anthropic product team's code, this doesn't sound like a selling point.
How much do you think it’s holding them back? Market share seems to be surviving the lack of quality vs the other players. Or possibly: they’re focusing where it matters?
It's surviving *for now*. This pace isn't sustainable, they know it, but they need to pretend until the IPO. That's when they'll start worrying about quality. The pace of feature creation is going to decrease the moment they float.
Re: Claude Tag
#118> Today, 65% of our product team’s code is created by our internal version of Claude Tag. Given the reliability and general product quality of the Anthropic product team's code, this doesn't sound like a selling point.
How much do you think it’s holding them back? Market share seems to be surviving the lack of quality vs the other players. Or possibly: they’re focusing where it matters?
Not germane to me whether it holds them back or not, I don't even use their products anymore. I'm just taking the piss, having a cheeky laugh at the expense of the company who brought us such breathless prose as "it’s a bit like selling nuclear weapons to North Korea" and "we are releasing a model that is too powerful for the public".
Like okay Jan lmao, seems like the North Koreans take their uptime a little more seriously than the nuclear weapons developers at Anthropic.
Re: Claude Tag
#119One thing that wasn't obvious in the post: it's usage (token) based pricing, not including in your existing Claude subscriptions.
Re: Claude Tag
#120We ought to rename HN to "The Claude Blog". This is a minor feature update to a slack plugin.
It's a major rewrite of the slack plugin, with far more functionality and more capabilities. More surfaces will be available in the future
"Major rewrite" from a company that has its products vibe-coded is hardly a worthy measurement.