Live data from Hacker News

Einstein's list of conditions for staying together with his wife

listsofnote.com

111–120 of 194 posts

Re: Einstein's list of conditions for staying together with his wife

#112
post #102

As the resident Serb here I should point out a Wikipedia page on Mileva Maric who was a brilliant scientific mind in her own right: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mileva_Maric There are even some theories that she helped him early on in his career although there is no strong evidence to support that theory. As part of the divorce agreement Einstein made with Mileva, his Nobel Prize money was transferred to her and in t…

Why are Serbs always pointing out their nationality?

So that we don't go around assuming everyone on the internet is American...

Re: Einstein's list of conditions for staying together with his wife

#113
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The OP is making a judgement based on the evidence he has, not on the evidence he doesn't. You on the other hand are attempting to counter his argument with no evidence at all. If you want to counter the argument, present contrary evidence.

What a horrible way to argue. So the thought "the evidence might not be sufficient" never comes to your mind? Uncritical thinking like this ("knee jerk reactions") are one of the banes of humanity.

I wasn't suggesting the OP's argument was fact. I'm simply suggesting one counters the argument by backing their own up.

I think the down votes are a little harsh.

Re: Einstein's list of conditions for staying together with his wife

#115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Cultivared men were not jerks then as a general rule.

The position of women in society in 1914 is in no way comparable to today. We have come a long long way since then, and we still have a long long way to go. Cultivated men are still jerks today, as a general rule. It's just that we are too blind to see (just like Einstein was in his day) that. Give it until 2110 to tell you just how much. In 1914 it was totally normal for women not to have the vote, not to have a say…

> Cultivated men are still jerks today, as a general rule. It's just that we are too blind to see (just like Einstein was in his day) that. Give it until 2110 to tell you just how much.

Same with women, and we'll have to wait just as long to see it.

Re: Einstein's list of conditions for staying together with his wife

#117
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, he only helped to build the most destructive weapon ever.

And the Wright brothers helped develop the craft the bomb would be carried on. What a couple of no good murderers they were.

Your comparison is retarded.

Re: Einstein's list of conditions for staying together with his wife

#118
post #108
post #107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So he was doing her a favour? Isn't he a father as well who should think for the best of his children too? So in other case he would just leave her with the children? Demanding 3 meals every day served or else is kind of disrespectful to someone you used to love.

3 meals a day might benefit the children, too. Not fighting in front of them is probably also a good idea. What does he propose that is bad for children?

Well, poster above me was implying that his demands were reasonable, as he is staying with her and children. If she wouldn't agree to him, he would leave and left her with children, that is not exactly unconditional love for his children and also sexist/macho.

Re: Einstein's list of conditions for staying together with his wife

#119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's an extremely difficult moral problem. It's akin to asking yourself if you would rather rescue the child on the left or the 3 people on the right when given the choice. And then with various permutations for the child being yours or a stranger and/or the people on the right being your parents and / or strangers. We are not well equipped to make such decisions.

It is a tough moral problem, but one that societies of old have recognized and formalized. For example, most all religions have some formal structure where a person with a "higher calling" can take up a monkhood of some sort. Formal induction into monkhood made their severance from family ties public and contractual, much as the formal wedding ceremony publicizes a man-woman relationship. We just don't have a sociall…

Well, the stereotype of the absent minded professor has existed for a long time now, as well as the hermit inventor/philosopher.

Perhaps not monkhood, but as an eccentric removing himself from society is a common occurrence. And for sufficiently levels of ability and talent, people are willing to forgo social convention.

I forget who it was, but one of the great ones long gone was extremely uncomfortable around people. To the extent that people were told that they should casually walk up to him, and without addressing him directly, talk to the air about the problem they were facing or had come up with.

Re: Einstein's list of conditions for staying together with his wife

#120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's an extremely difficult moral problem. It's akin to asking yourself if you would rather rescue the child on the left or the 3 people on the right when given the choice. And then with various permutations for the child being yours or a stranger and/or the people on the right being your parents and / or strangers. We are not well equipped to make such decisions.

It is a tough moral problem, but one that societies of old have recognized and formalized. For example, most all religions have some formal structure where a person with a "higher calling" can take up a monkhood of some sort. Formal induction into monkhood made their severance from family ties public and contractual, much as the formal wedding ceremony publicizes a man-woman relationship. We just don't have a sociall…

For some, like Mendel, regular monkhood did the job.
Post reply on HN