Live data from Hacker News

Stack Overflow’s forum is dead but the company’s still kicking

sherwood.news

111–120 of 267 posts

Re: Stack Overflow’s forum is dead but the company’s still kicking

#111
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We may need to create a community driven version of SO. Hard for it to be a successful business these days.

https://software.codidact.com/ was created after one of the many SO dramas. It doesn't come up in searches though and I didn't have reason to use it...

thanks, that's exactly what I was imagining.

Re: Stack Overflow’s forum is dead but the company’s still kicking

#112
post #22

Thanks for this post. Unfortunately, you used the wrong word choice here and this question has 13 other answers that have some of the same words but don't really answer your particular question so it has been deleted. Also, if this remains posted, my not-on-point answer will get less views. There's more than one reason that forum is dead.

Agree. But I asked a couple questions about a year ago and got zero response. It's not just people asking questions who deserted SO, it is also people answering them (probably a chicken and egg problem - reversal of network effects).

I had a work SO account with many questions/answers - everything fine. Later I created a SO account for use with my private projects and happened to have answered a couple questions without getting upvotes. The algorithm banned me from answering questions with the remark that I should improve the quality of my answers. You can bet that I never answered a question again on SO with any account.

Re: Stack Overflow’s forum is dead but the company’s still kicking

#113
post #89
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Much of what Claude insists you do probably came from SO.

I've seen chatgpt word for word plagiarise stack overflow answers

i've seen it plagiarize personal blog posts too, almost verbatim code line by line.... kind of shocking...

Re: Stack Overflow’s forum is dead but the company’s still kicking

#114
post #43
post #34

I knew that stack overflow must be suffering because of AI, but I find it hard to believe that questions asked per month has gone from 200k pre-chatbot to (what appears to be) ~1k. Although, I suppose I have not gone there at all in the last 4 years...

Clicking through to the query for the first chart, I see the peak of ~300k in May of 2020, and it was ~3k in April of 2026 (the last complete month). I’m flabbergasted. https://data.stackexchange.com/stackoverflow/revision/193252...

Nah.... surely not. [looking at the link] Holy shitsnacks... I gotta be reading this wrong. Is it really dying? Like seriously, wtf.

The Ghost of Expert Sexchange gets its revenge.

Re: Stack Overflow’s forum is dead but the company’s still kicking

#115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> against some guy whose newfound obsession was whether you had an XY Problem Against some volunteer who's encountering their fourteenth clear XY problem of the day.

That's the thing though, it was voluntary. If it isn't fun to do, and simply causes frustration, that hypothetical person constructed in the comment could just step away for the day. I get that dealing with low quality questions wasn't great, but imagine spending an afternoon researching a weird thing using some tools your organization mandates, writing it up, only for that person to skim it and just assume you reall…

> If it isn't fun to do, and simply causes frustration, that hypothetical person constructed in the comment could just step away for the day.

That frustration is likely part of the decline, yes.

Re: Stack Overflow’s forum is dead but the company’s still kicking

#116

Stack Overflow might be the greatest receptacles of human knowledge on programming. But I would argue that it usefulness only extends to its body of knowledge. As a service and/or community it has been pretty terrible for a long time: If you were a new user trying to learn programming, it was maybe one of the most toxic resources available. I don't think I have posted a question since 2019. And even there, the only t…

Early years SO was optimized for people helping people. Later on they ruined the site by optimizing for tidiness ... and griefing users (especially new ones) off the site in the process.

a.k.a enshitification

Re: Stack Overflow’s forum is dead but the company’s still kicking

#117
post #5

Call me crazy but sometimes I still find a better solution on StackOverflow than what Claude Code insists to do. I'm not sure we're better off without SO in the long run.

Agreed. Which is also odd, if you think about it. Surely with the amount of compute Anthropic and others have available, they could test each of the solutions in the SO data they surely have and rank them based on efficiency/elegance/other criteria and remove poor solutions from their training data.

Re: Stack Overflow’s forum is dead but the company’s still kicking

#118
Where do we go now for the answers validated by the community? How do we build knowledge? The answers that Claude gives might look good, but without community edits, votes, and comments it's a lot harder to evaluate.

I don't see a way back, but it does feel like abandoning public transportation because we all own electric bikes now.

Re: Stack Overflow’s forum is dead but the company’s still kicking

#119
post #18

The author labels COVID and the launch of ChatGPT on the graph, but fails to mention that Stack Overflow was acquired in June 2021 by Prosus, a Dutch private equity firm. That looks to me like it matches pretty well with the entire downward trend.

I don't think so. StackOverflow itself didn't really change for any of that period. Any changes in users must have been due to external factors.

Re: Stack Overflow’s forum is dead but the company’s still kicking

#120
post #51

LLMs are better than slow human support of any kind for debugging / helpdesk work (which was never that welcome at SO anyway). Stack Overflow is still great for canonical questions, multiple answers, public / SEO'd discussion between humans, etc. But that probably isn't enough to save the company as a private equity acquisition hoping to 100x their $1.8 billion investment. Hopefully the classic Q/A site eventually ge…

to paraphrase a bad movie: what does a qa site need with 1.8 billion dollars?

  > Wikimedia-like foundation
agree, best way to preserve the original goal imo
Post reply on HN