Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's tempting to blame any political outcome you don't like on lobbying. It allows you to believe that almost no one supports the outcome that you don't like, because you can blame it on politicians manage to be bought by a small number of lobbyists. But it might not be the case. Several states (I believe Texas, Georgia, and Indiana) don't charge sales tax to data centers. So from Louisiana's perspective, the alterna…
"If states all worked together, they could plausibly prevent this race to the bottom by agreeing on a universal sales tax minimum" The states, under Trump, are all working together to ensure a race to the bottom happens, both in the U.S. and abroad. One hundred and thirty five nations worked together to create a minimum corporate tax rate called "Pillar Two". It would have factored in tax breaks for projects like thi…
Meta to receive $3.3B in tax breaks for its $10B Louisiana data center
111–120 of 189 posts
Re: Meta to receive $3.3B in tax breaks for its $10B Louisiana data center
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
There's a lot of ground between gifting $3.3 billion in tax incentives to a megacorp for a short-term increase in construction employment and allowing a homeowner build a second dwelling on their lot. Incidentally, that same $3.3 billion could build around 10,000 accessory dwellings in Baton Rouge.
Re: Meta to receive $3.3B in tax breaks for its $10B Louisiana data center
#113Now if they can actually do something with AI that is meaningful? I assume Mark is trying to reach for like some crazy goal instead of just getting reasonable products to market. I've known the type of person who chases the stars instead of just taking their time, building up the core and then snowballing into greatness.
It's actually kind of amazing that (apparently, but I'm willing to be wrong) AI has resulted in more people getting banned (rather than less, which you would think. You would think AI makes this easier to filter out, search for problem accounts, whatever) Like, the problem was always the asymmetry. Can FB police everything? Probably not. Should they be able to operate at scale if they can't? Unclear. Section 230 blah…
I do hate it though, Mark has meaningful funding to build some actually useful AI, hell if he started bottom up, he can have his anime waifu he wants.
Re: Meta to receive $3.3B in tax breaks for its $10B Louisiana data center
#114Re: Meta to receive $3.3B in tax breaks for its $10B Louisiana data center
#115> Hyperion will be exempt from state and local sales and use taxes on its data center equipment for the next 20 years, which includes the GPUs that train and develop AI models. Sherwood News estimated that since the state’s combined state and local sales tax stands at 9.56%, spending the roughly $35 billion for the GPUs of the center will hand the firm about $3.3 billion in tax breaks.
Re: Meta to receive $3.3B in tax breaks for its $10B Louisiana data center
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s the phrasing/tone. It’s such a red flag. As to his being answered: somebody responding to him in good faith does not suddenly validate what he was doing.
There was nothing wrong or offensive with my phrasing.
Re: Meta to receive $3.3B in tax breaks for its $10B Louisiana data center
#117From https://sherwood.news/tech/hyperion/ >> Per the report, the package of tax breaks and incentives was achieved through local officials bound by nondisclosure agreements, quietly struck legislative deals, and parliamentary sleight of hand to avoid public scrutiny of the deal. >> So the residents of Richland Parish did not have much of a heads-up on what was coming. No voting, no public interests, only closed-door…
but there will be voting; all of the elected officials will have to face elections at some point, and voters can put their feet down right now: everyone is voted out.
Re: Meta to receive $3.3B in tax breaks for its $10B Louisiana data center
#118From https://sherwood.news/tech/hyperion/ >> Per the report, the package of tax breaks and incentives was achieved through local officials bound by nondisclosure agreements, quietly struck legislative deals, and parliamentary sleight of hand to avoid public scrutiny of the deal. >> So the residents of Richland Parish did not have much of a heads-up on what was coming. No voting, no public interests, only closed-door…
I'm not at all surprised to learn that Republican politicians royally screwed their constituents. I was going to say maybe these people will vote better next time just to read that Colorado governor is commuting the sentence of Tina Peters. Democratic leadership is so freaking weak it's unbelievable. With one party full of grifters and the other with full of weaklings, we need to abolish this two-party system.
Re: Meta to receive $3.3B in tax breaks for its $10B Louisiana data center
#119From https://sherwood.news/tech/hyperion/ >> Per the report, the package of tax breaks and incentives was achieved through local officials bound by nondisclosure agreements, quietly struck legislative deals, and parliamentary sleight of hand to avoid public scrutiny of the deal. >> So the residents of Richland Parish did not have much of a heads-up on what was coming. No voting, no public interests, only closed-door…
I'm not at all surprised to learn that Republican politicians royally screwed their constituents. I was going to say maybe these people will vote better next time just to read that Colorado governor is commuting the sentence of Tina Peters. Democratic leadership is so freaking weak it's unbelievable. With one party full of grifters and the other with full of weaklings, we need to abolish this two-party system.
Re: Meta to receive $3.3B in tax breaks for its $10B Louisiana data center
#120Earlier quoted context omitted.
There was nothing wrong or offensive with my phrasing.
I'm surprised that your comment is dead. Apparently there was evidence ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153756 ), so I don't see the problem with having asked.