Live data from Hacker News

Killed by Apple

killedbyapple.theden.sh

111–120 of 135 posts

Re: Killed by Apple

#111
post #2

Many of them are hardware which is understandable. It would be nice, but perhaps hard to do, to have a list of "sherlocked" apps and services.

Not supporting old hardware is fine. Forbidding users from updating their hardware themselves is killing it though.

Re: Killed by Apple

#112
post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I always thought it was strange how intolerant Homebrew is of users who are not surfing the bleeding edge. I held out using MacPorts for ages, but there came a point when I just could not reasonably expect to find the software I needed on MacPorts, but could on Homebrew, and so I switched. I wish Homebrew hadn't won that particular mindshare war. Moving from MacPorts to Homebrew felt like downgrading from an actual p…

The good news is that MacPorts is IMO better than ever. I previously did the MacPorts -> Homebrew switch, but recently moved back and am very happy with MacPorts.

I never moved to Homebrew, and never understood the appeal. It’s refreshing to see people coming back to MacPorts after the last decade.

Re: Killed by Apple

#113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apple could easily support eGPUs if they wanted to, but they choose to have vertical integration over fragmentation or usefulness. It's the same as them not supporting OpenGL or Vulkan: they could if they wanted to be a better gaming/porting target, but compatibility of any sort is not a priority.

Apple did recently approve drivers for both nvidia and amd, but not for gaming purposes. Apple supported OpenGL plenty, just that the world moved. Apple created metal, shortly after Vulkan was created. "They could support it if they wanted to" is almost a tautology. Of course they could. But then they have to support another thing. They are on the hook when something goes wrong.

What they approved was very limited, unofficial 3rd party drivers with very limited application.

It's the first positive sign in a decade but also almost entirely unrelated to what people would consider supporting AMD and Nvidia cards.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640380

Re: Killed by Apple

#114
post #13

The whole premise of this site is very negative and pessimistic in nature. Why the emphasis on "killed", rather than "innovated" or "created"? The expectation should not be for products to last for ever. And for each product that happened, more products came after that were inspired by it.

Not everyone has the urge to replace absolutely everything with the same deal but with a positive spin. Lottery factor, unaliving etc.

That's not what I mean. I like having products, but you can't really truly innovate if you insist on keeping products that may not make sense. That's why Google, Apple etc eventually cut products.

Google's list is pretty extreme though.

Re: Killed by Apple

#115
I'm more interested in the technology they've acquired to kill, like buying up every company making assistive technology for the blind and then destroying them to make their facial unlock feature.

Re: Killed by Apple

#116
post #16

Aperture is the only Apple software I miss. Sometimes I feel they killed 32bits app too soon

The guy who led the Aperture, iPhoto, RAW Camera and Core Image engineering teams (an 18-year Apple veteran) is behind Nitro, which works on macOS, iPadOS and iOS.

https://www.gentlemencoders.com/nitro-for-macos/

Re: Killed by Apple

#117

Hacker news holds Apple and Google to different standards, so I doubt this post will get much traction. (I'm still angry about how I must use an iPhone if I want to be able to text high quality video to people I don't know very well)

> I'm still angry about how I must use an iPhone if I want to be able to text high quality video to people I don't know very well You’re mad at the wrong people in this case though. iMessage can do high quality video and images because it’s a separate channel from the telecoms. RCS can now do high quality video and images too because it’s a newer standard and was built for that (and iPhones do support RCS now). But f…

Apple has absolutely been dragging its feet on RCS. The DoJ explicitly accused them of degrading cross-platform messaging to protect their smartphone dominance. Internal Apple communications revealed that executives were worried that bringing iMessage to Android would "remove an obstacle to iPhone families giving their kids Android phones."

Apple is clearly the bad guy on the RCS issue.

Re: Killed by Apple

#118
post #3

They removed the speed and pitch adjuster in QuickTime player, some time in the past decade, I forget when. That was a useful feature to me. It's not on the site, and I don't care _quite_ enough to figure out how to add it. That's the problem with built-in software that "does it all" and crowds out the market for other software. One day it might not do it all. (VLC can do this, but not as simply as I used to be able…

It is still possible to adjust the speed in QuickTime Player: from .5 to 2x. Not available via Quicklook, but definitely there in the player, either in the menu bar or by clicking the >> in the video window.

Re: Killed by Apple

#119
Mac Studio is the Pro. It should have always been. Mini should be Mac. Studio, Neo, Mini et al fall outside of what makes the Mac line up comprehensive to me. iPad Mini is not mini, it's an iPad 8", like... there is an 11/13" ones. And it should have an M chip because Balatro is so sweet on my 11 Pro and chokes on whatever is in the Mini. There should a Pro version of it with Face ID for a hundo more. I like most about the iPad Mini, but give me Face ID and speed and charge me more for a smaller screen, I am tired rotating the damn thing trying to find where the Touch ID button is. WTH is the iPad Air? Pro sans Face ID and some screen stuff? Don't they pay their people well?

PSA - Ford killed the Model T. Big whoop.

Re: Killed by Apple

#120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The good news is that MacPorts is IMO better than ever. I previously did the MacPorts -> Homebrew switch, but recently moved back and am very happy with MacPorts.

I never moved to Homebrew, and never understood the appeal. It’s refreshing to see people coming back to MacPorts after the last decade.

If you ever try to install any packages from GH or an indie, you only get brew install/cask instructions. It's game over.

Regarding the appeal, this probably exists in Mac Ports, I do not know since you guys reminded me it still existed, but Brewfile lets me provision a new Mac very efficiently.

Post reply on HN