Live data from Hacker News

Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker

discuss.grapheneos.org

111–120 of 343 posts

Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker

#111
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a personality type / disorder (pick your poison). There's no hope for change. Programming seems to attract such people, because they are fixated on being right and proving that they are right. I know a few more examples. My common sense policy is - if the software these types produce works for me, I will be using it, but I will never allow myself to be dependent on it. That kind of person will gladly burn their…

[flagged]

Ok, but what I'd be wrong about here? I'm not even claiming that the person in the article is that way. I don't know enough about them. I have noticed a certain trend, however, and that's what I was noting.

Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker

#112
post #82

The fact that graphane is getting attacked speaks enough for it's relability. First in france now in Wired. I'm more concerned that Signal incorporated in US is having easy life.

> I'm more concerned that Signal incorporated in US is having easy life. To add - ironically, it was Durov (Telegram founder) who got arrested in Paris.

I don't find it ironic at all. Zero trust for anything Russia related.

Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker

#113

I love GrapheneOS and I use it daily for more than 2 years. However, and as Louis Rossmann pointed out in one of his videos, they really need to work on the "defensiveness" and "rants" of their communication. Even when they are 99% right most of the time, they sometimes don't come as mature and professional.

It would be interesting if there were a state sponsored effort to discredit a project that helps some people keep their communications private.

Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker

#114
post #108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

There you go again. Example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47247016

Yes, I don't like when anybody spreads falsehoods about any important free software. Do you?

However your example is unrelated. Their arguments were rather reasonable and informative in the discussion you linked to. So I don't complain about that anymore.

Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker

#115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I'm more concerned that Signal incorporated in US is having easy life. To add - ironically, it was Durov (Telegram founder) who got arrested in Paris.

I don't find it ironic at all. Zero trust for anything Russia related.

he is not pro-Putin, the Telegram team was forced to leave and it has been blocked several times in Russia.

Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker

#117
post #56
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you own something you can do what you want with it including rendering it useless

If you own all of it, yes. If you only own most of it, the minority owners do have some rights -- just fewer than you do.

Sure!

Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker

#118

I love GrapheneOS and I use it daily for more than 2 years. However, and as Louis Rossmann pointed out in one of his videos, they really need to work on the "defensiveness" and "rants" of their communication. Even when they are 99% right most of the time, they sometimes don't come as mature and professional.

It would be interesting if there were a state sponsored effort to discredit a project that helps some people keep their communications private.

There might be one, in France.

Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker

#119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Immature maybe Yeah, that’s the issue. I don’t want people who behave immaturely, impulsively, or vindictively, having a key role in something as important as my phone os. I want stability, maturity, and thoughtfulness.

Mental health and wellness issues in high tech research and development are everywhere. I would suggest that you focus on the product and what it can/cannot do for you.

When you have to trust the OS images generated by the authors it becomes a massive issue.
Post reply on HN