Vercel April 2026 security incident
111–120 of 540 posts
Re: Vercel April 2026 security incident
#112Re: Vercel April 2026 security incident
#113What is the rationale for using vercel ? I'm getting a lot of value out of cloudflare with the $5/month plan lately but my bare metal box with triple digit ram has seen zero downtime since 2015.
Re: Vercel April 2026 security incident
#114[flagged]
Re: Vercel April 2026 security incident
#115What is the rationale for using vercel ? I'm getting a lot of value out of cloudflare with the $5/month plan lately but my bare metal box with triple digit ram has seen zero downtime since 2015.
Can one host a Next js app on cloudflare?
Re: Vercel April 2026 security incident
#116Re: Vercel April 2026 security incident
#117What is the rationale for using vercel ? I'm getting a lot of value out of cloudflare with the $5/month plan lately but my bare metal box with triple digit ram has seen zero downtime since 2015.
0.82% of homes are burglarized every year. Meaning since 2015, you’ve got an 8.2% chance of having someone walk out with that box. Hopefully there’s nothing precious on it.
Re: Vercel April 2026 security incident
#118Claude Code defaulting to a certain set of recommended providers[0] and frameworks is making the web more homogenous and that lack of diversity is increasing the blast radius of incidents [0] https://amplifying.ai/research/claude-code-picks/report
Re: Vercel April 2026 security incident
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
0.82% of homes are burglarized every year. Meaning since 2015, you’ve got an 8.2% chance of having someone walk out with that box. Hopefully there’s nothing precious on it.
That’s not how probabilities work.
Thieves probably look for small stuff like jewelry, cash, laptops, not some big old server.
Re: Vercel April 2026 security incident
#120Claude Code defaulting to a certain set of recommended providers[0] and frameworks is making the web more homogenous and that lack of diversity is increasing the blast radius of incidents [0] https://amplifying.ai/research/claude-code-picks/report
It's a good point, but I don't think the problem here is Claude. It's how you use it. We need to be guiding developers to not let Claude make decisions for them. It can help guide decisions, but ultimately one must perform the critical thinking to make sure it is the right choice. This is no different than working with any other teammate for that matter.
However it is less clear on how to do this, people mostly take the easiest path.