So basically the gloves that kitchen staff now must wear means we get an extra dose of micro plastics? Yikes.
> So basically the gloves that kitchen staff now must wear [..] Genuine question: we used to simply wash our hands well before preparing food. At what point did the wearing of disposable gloves become "better"?
Nitrile and latex gloves may cause overestimation of microplastics
111–120 of 282 posts
Re: Nitrile and latex gloves may cause overestimation of microplastics
#112Classic. This is like that female serial killer in Europe that turned out to actually just be DNA from a woman making the DNA collection swabs.
Re: Nitrile and latex gloves may cause overestimation of microplastics
#113So basically the gloves that kitchen staff now must wear means we get an extra dose of micro plastics? Yikes.
Re: Nitrile and latex gloves may cause overestimation of microplastics
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
The problem isn't just the plastics themselves. Plastics are chemical "sponges" that will soak up pollutants over time from the environment (brominated fire retardants, bisphenols, PBCs, pesticides, phthalates, heavy metals, etc) and deliver them in a concentrated dose into the body. Even if plastics of all sizes are 100% biologically inert, they're still a Trojan Horse for other toxins. https://www.sciencedirect.com…
>Roughly 50% of indoor dust is composed of microplastics, so it's not like it's uncommon. I highly doubt that. Soil, skin and pollen are usually the big ones. Hairs depending one how you count dust, but eliminating hair like fibres would also eliminate most of the sources of plastic, unless you allow really large particle sizes. [edit] Checking research. The highest claim I found was 39% of fibres (in household dust,…
Re: Nitrile and latex gloves may cause overestimation of microplastics
#115This is good news, probably. We'll have to wait and see which studies replicate and which don't.
Re: Nitrile and latex gloves may cause overestimation of microplastics
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think anyone will claim microplastics don't exist, but people will definitely be skeptical of articles about how many there, and where they're found. At worst, I'd expect to see people disregarding the threat, not disregarding the presence of the microplastics themselves.
I'm not sure if they have established a threat. I thought it was mostly hypothesised or very locally specific harms. On the other hand I suspect much of the real science on environmental plastic might avoid the term microplastic since it seems to have a meaning that flows to whatever can make the scariest headline today. I have seen the size range to qualify run from microscopic up to a couple of millimetres. Volumes…
Re: Nitrile and latex gloves may cause overestimation of microplastics
#117So basically the gloves that kitchen staff now must wear means we get an extra dose of micro plastics? Yikes.
Funnily, I believe the glove mandates for food prep are actually anti-hygiene. Unlike bare skin, you can't really feel when your gloves are contaminated. So you are less likely to replace gloves when you should. With bare hands, you can feel the raw chicken juices on you, so it's pretty natural to want to wash your hands right after handling the raw chicken. Gloves are important in medicine, but that's with proper us…
I’ve never seen for example sushi portrayed with anything but bare hands
Re: Nitrile and latex gloves may cause overestimation of microplastics
#118This study assumes everybody is oblivious to contamination, and explicitly says they can't differentiate. Not useful and bordering on the tautological
Re: Nitrile and latex gloves may cause overestimation of microplastics
#119So basically the gloves that kitchen staff now must wear means we get an extra dose of micro plastics? Yikes.
Funnily, I believe the glove mandates for food prep are actually anti-hygiene. Unlike bare skin, you can't really feel when your gloves are contaminated. So you are less likely to replace gloves when you should. With bare hands, you can feel the raw chicken juices on you, so it's pretty natural to want to wash your hands right after handling the raw chicken. Gloves are important in medicine, but that's with proper us…
To the contrary. You take off and throw out your gloves every time you finish doing something with raw meat. It's procedure. It's habit.
You're never relying on "feel" to determine whether there are "raw chicken juices on you". Using "feel" is not reliable.
I don't know why you think food service workers aren't constantly putting on new gloves, but doctors and nurses are. Like, if you're cutting up chicken for an hour you're not, but if you're moving from chicken to veggies you absolutely are.
Re: Nitrile and latex gloves may cause overestimation of microplastics
#120I'm amazed that wasn't taken into account! Many years ago, in the final year of my Biology degree, I did a paid summer internship at an Evolutionary Biology lab here in Spain, assisting in a project where they were researching relationships between metal ion accumulation (mostly zinc) and certain SNPs (≈"gene varieties"). A lot of my work was in slicing tiny fragments of deep-frozen human livers and kidneys in a bios…
What boggles the mind is you commenting on an article you clearly did not read...stating something that is not there...