Live data from Hacker News

Mystery jump in oil trading ahead of Trump post draws scrutiny

bbc.com

111–120 of 419 posts

Re: Mystery jump in oil trading ahead of Trump post draws scrutiny

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That assumes the new system will be better. History tells us otherwise

Almost every new system of governance has been better than what came before.

This... is a very selective remembering of history, no?

Re: Mystery jump in oil trading ahead of Trump post draws scrutiny

#112

I'm growing pessimistic that this kind of activity + the egregious presidential-level crypto scams will never see justice. What's the path for that, really?

I have accepted that a lot of effort has been put into making sure these people never see justice and they probably won't. I put my energy into strengthening democracy and institutions for the next generation so they have the opportunity to do better than we have.

Re: Mystery jump in oil trading ahead of Trump post draws scrutiny

#113
post #71
post #30

People got exactly what they voted for. It would be hilarious, if it wasn't so serious.

[flagged]

Since you've drawn the comparison, it's worth pointing out that a notable difference is that Nancy Pelosi was not (nor was running to be) POTUS and could not have unilaterally gotten the US into a war in the middle east.

Re: Mystery jump in oil trading ahead of Trump post draws scrutiny

#114

I'm not smart enough to understand why - but surely this isn't sustainable? At some point wont the price not reflect the reality of simply not having gas to put in your car? What is going on... The price of oil went down 10% yesterday, opened +0% today and is back to +4%...

Oil price is famously disconnected from how much is being pumped out of the ground at any given time. But eventually, yes, if the conflict lasts for long enough material reality will catch up with markets (or is it the other way around?).

Re: Mystery jump in oil trading ahead of Trump post draws scrutiny

#115
post #101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not that complicated. Elect a Democrat in 2028 who will nominate a strong AG, not a useless ditherer like Garland. What a disgraceful tenure he had. If he was going to take so long to bring charges he should have just avoided it. Instead he takes 3 years to bring all these charges which naturally look like election interference and as such are paused until they choke the election away and the new justice departm…

> Elect a Democrat in 2028 Does everyone still believe this will be possible/happen/allowed by the current regime?

Is this supposed to be an intelligent comment? Is your answer to forgo elections ahead of time? You plan for the worst outcome by already accepting it as reality?

Why don't you work on lobbying your grandparents and their vote because I seriously doubt you are equipped for whatever armed conflict you are imagining. Have some dignity. If Americans are so called upon to defend the constitution then so be it, there is no need to prematurely soil your pants about it.

Re: Mystery jump in oil trading ahead of Trump post draws scrutiny

#116
post #96
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

No idea why you're getting downvoted, this is absolutely true. The people have lost faith in both parties, we now expect our leaders to be cronies.

People just don't like the "both sides are the same" clownery anymore. It's not true and will never be true.

Re: Mystery jump in oil trading ahead of Trump post draws scrutiny

#118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it's likely that they'll see justice in a chaotic way , ie not connected to the specific crime. Most likely outcome is that they make huge paper profits that are then absolutely worthless because the dollar collapses and the property rights that enforce the wealth they gained from these transactions disappear as the government is toppled. Another likely outcome is that they get in the habit of doing criminal…

> Most likely outcome is that they make huge paper profits that are then absolutely worthless because the dollar collapses Seems like it'd be pretty easy to diversify into inflation-protected assets after taking big profits. But I also don't see the dollar collapsing any time soon. The dollar's strength is built on the US economy, and the US economy is still one of the strongest in the world, with high productivity p…

I believe the dollars strength is built on its unassailability as the petrodollar and foreign reserve currency, which lets the fed set interest rates and print money while creating less inflation than any other currency. The world looks very very different when energy markets aren’t fulfilled in dollars in ways that most citizens won’t understand.

Re: Mystery jump in oil trading ahead of Trump post draws scrutiny

#119
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"The Treasury just declared the U.S. insolvent. The media missed it" - https://fortune.com/2026/03/23/us-government-insolvent-fisca...

I made a face, reading this article. They present the US gov't's very large and scary liabilities and future obligations, but they don't present the other side of the picture, the future income streams. (How much can the US government realistically expect to earn annually via taxation?) Without being able to compare future liabilities to future income, we're lacking critical context. It's like they wrote half an arti…

There is no feasible scenario where tax revenues will allow the US government to pay a 39 Trillion, soon to be 40 Trillion debt. And paying the debt its not even in discussion right now.

What is in discussion, are the multiple, very feasible, and very realistic scenarios, where an increase in interest rates, and a run from the dollar...Will force the US government to spend over 80% of the tax revenue, JUST TO SERVICE the debt interest....

Re: Mystery jump in oil trading ahead of Trump post draws scrutiny

#120
post #90
post #10

[flagged]

Corruption is worsening and never attenuates on its own. We need a third party devoted to indiscriminately tackling the problem. Problem is, the people who pick and choose which politicians win will never allow it, because they are significant benefactors and fostered this duopoly to begin with.

Voters?
Post reply on HN