Live data from Hacker News

2026 tech layoffs reach 45,000 in March

technode.global

111–120 of 164 posts

Re: 2026 tech layoffs reach 45,000 in March

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

FDR essentially pioneered the modern use of the omnibus bill by threatening to veto any assistance to the poor/elderly that didn't include social security. Basically his goal was to make the poor starve if social security didn't pass, and blackmail politicians into being forced to vote for it. Of course this was all predicated on the other prong, which was the 'switch in time that saved 9' where he also threatened to…

[flagged]

Re: 2026 tech layoffs reach 45,000 in March

#112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It would be incredible to think that Mark Zuckerberg genuinely thought their Metaverse/VR investment was going to be akin to Xerox's bayarea PARC campus (developer of modern networking / GUI &c). I guess both were ultimately profit-negative financial disasters.

It's easy to get caught up in your own hype when you're surrounded entirely by people who always tell you what you want to hear.

I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately… For years this has been said, and for most of us isn’t something we’ve been able to experience until recently. Yet, now we can see how chatbots have made sane folks lose their minds, by simply being too agreeable. I think it’s a grim look at what it’s like to be hyper wealthy. The odds that they’ve completely disassociated from reality, IMHO, have increased exponentially after seeing the effects on “normal” people. The only difference is us plebs, don’t have the resources to then bring our distorted view of reality to life.

Re: 2026 tech layoffs reach 45,000 in March

#113
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And for how many more years are we going to be calling this a post-Covid market correction?

In a very real sense these are still ripples from the death of Franz Ferdinand.

I would argue this is more a result of the defeat of Xerxes at Thermopylae.

Re: 2026 tech layoffs reach 45,000 in March

#114
post #31
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In a zero interest rate environment, literally any return on investment justifies spending. If interest rates are 3.8%, the company needs at least a 3.8% return every year on your yearly compensation to justify your job.

Not if they are compensated during the year. Grocery stores have slim margins, but if you make 10k after selling 1M worth of stock buy turn over that stock 12 times a year that’s ~12% annual ROI not 1%.

If the company is spending $100k to employ you, you need to deliver $103.8k/year of value.

Re: 2026 tech layoffs reach 45,000 in March

#115
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Surprised it took this long. I feel bad for the employees, but I can’t remember the last success they had. Metaverse, VR, throwing absurd money at AI and for what?

Their last success was acquiring Instagram in 2012. Every new effort since then has been hemorrhaging money. They get away with it because they have two limitless money faucets in Facebook and Instagram, but their product strategy as a whole has been a disaster.

> Their last success was acquiring Instagram in 2012.

WhatsApp can be dubbed a success as well, and Oculus wasn't a flop. And, what does that tell you about the company? They can only acquire and integrate products. Why? Because Leetcode (LC). Fk LC, Hard!!!

Re: 2026 tech layoffs reach 45,000 in March

#116
There's little to no evidence that companies are actually doing layoffs to focus on "AI-enabled" work.

All there is are layoffs because of interest rates and concerns about the economic outlook. Companies using "AI" as a fig leaf justification and people are apparently falling for it.

Re: 2026 tech layoffs reach 45,000 in March

#117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was laid off from Atlassian this/last week. Since then I've been playing Satisfactory for 12 hours a day. Crazy thing is, I delivered optimizations that saved 1m USD over the last 12 months, with another optimization in-flight that would save another 1m USD. I thought that was enough to protect me from layoffs/PIPs - I guess no one was counting. AI is just an excuse for layoffs which IMO CEOs are trying to use to r…

Your problem was that you tried doing work. What you want to do as an employee is make it so they can’t fire you not that you are actually useful.

[deleted]

Re: 2026 tech layoffs reach 45,000 in March

#118
impact of A.I - reality vs hype

reality - companies are choosing to spend money on CAPEX (i.e infrastructure things hoping that they can ride an uncertain wave into the future) and not spend on OPEX (humans)

reality - AI agents are not doing human jobs.

reality - money | debt is now more expensive. hence if you were spending more of it on OPEX stuff you would rather reduce that

reality - more coasting jobs in tech. demand for stuff that still needs to get done is super high - workers just need to get more distributed and not hoarded at the big paying firms

Re: 2026 tech layoffs reach 45,000 in March

#119
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mark Zuckerberg is no longer the kingmaker that he was during Facebook's peak, and he is desperately trying to create the next platform to be the one in power once again. It would be sad if it wasn't so unbelievably destructive to everything it touches.

Curious to see how they can turn moltbook into a money maker. Do they sell ads to agents?

Wasn't it primarily acqui-hire? Meta's AI strategy is what exactly? The best time for them to release a Chat GPT clone was 2 years ago. The second best time is today.

Re: 2026 tech layoffs reach 45,000 in March

#120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was laid off from Atlassian this/last week. Since then I've been playing Satisfactory for 12 hours a day. Crazy thing is, I delivered optimizations that saved 1m USD over the last 12 months, with another optimization in-flight that would save another 1m USD. I thought that was enough to protect me from layoffs/PIPs - I guess no one was counting. AI is just an excuse for layoffs which IMO CEOs are trying to use to r…

Your problem was that you tried doing work. What you want to do as an employee is make it so they can’t fire you not that you are actually useful.

How would you advise making it so they can't fire you?
Post reply on HN