Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Toyotas and Terrorists: "Why are ISIS's trucks better than ours?" (2023)

airuniversity.af.edu

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

111–120 of 135 posts

Re: Toyotas and Terrorists: "Why are ISIS's trucks better than ours?" (2023)

#111

Post by chongli »

duxup wrote: post #104
chongli wrote: post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s the same story as the Casio F-91W as well as the AK-47. Terrorists (or just any armed paramilitary group) who live in the back country far from common supply lines have a great need for standardized, rugged, reliable, and repairable technology. By living that life, they’re basically forced to think about these issues as a matter of survival.

Well I think the F-91 is durable, it’s probably not repaired as much as discarded as it is cheap. Disposable is likely the advantage there.

I've read that it's quite usable as a spare part itself, in order to make a cheap and reliable time-bomb IED. It has a built-in alarm and it's apparently not too difficult to use the alarm's beeper signal to set off the bomb at an exact time of day. This would otherwise be quite difficult and time-consuming to build out of a box of off-the-shelf electronic components (not to mention a UI for setting the alarm).

The fact that the watch is so ubiquitous means the paramilitaries can write and distribute a standard field manual explaining how to do this, knowing that anyone wanting to build an IED ought to be able to acquire some of the watches on their own.

Re: Toyotas and Terrorists: "Why are ISIS's trucks better than ours?" (2023)

#112

Post by shawn_w »

zdragnar wrote: post #78
HNisCIS wrote: post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's the thing though, they can't, at least until the very recent advent of EVs. We used to have similar vehicles (the old 80s/90s ford ranger, tacoma, etc) but they were regulated out of existence by CAFE standards. Even if you repealed CAFE today, the automakers have all built their entire business strategy around selling enormous expensive vehicles and generally despise producing lower cost options. We are start…

They are massive because of the cafe standards. There's plenty enough of a market for smaller trucks, even the Ford Maverick which is closer to a car with a bed sold out immediately. I like my big truck but when it dies, if there's a small truck available that lets me plow snow and tow logs in the forest, I'll get it.

Smaller trucks don't have the suspension etc. for mounting a snow plow, or heavy towing. Those are applications where a bigger heavy duty truck make sense.

Re: Toyotas and Terrorists: "Why are ISIS's trucks better than ours?" (2023)

#113

Post by conductr »

bluGill wrote: post #58
conductr wrote: post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is the mounting problem even real? I’ve shot a 50 cal rifle unmounted and I’d venture to say it could be mounted to anything. It’s mainly for ergonomic / accuracy / rapid fire stability and doesn’t need significant structural support. You could probably mount it to an ATV if you wanted to.

Sort of. A truck has a frame that you can drill a hole in and bolt the thing to. Simple and easy. A typical uni-body car is most than strong enough for the weight, but there is likely no place where the sheet metal is strong enough to support the bolt. You can make it work if you want, but it requires a more complex mounting system. (of course a truck has a nice open bed which has other advantages for mounting a gun…

Makes sense. I think this is what I called ergonomics not “strong enough to” which GP comment hinted to needing a significant structural factor. The form factor of a truck bed is certainly optimal compared to most other things of course

Re: Toyotas and Terrorists: "Why are ISIS's trucks better than ours?" (2023)

#114

Post by downut »

AndrewKemendo wrote: post #87
downut wrote: post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So is mine (2001TRD bought new). Searched all over AZ looking for manual everything and I got it, except for the trans. It replaced an fj60 Landcruiser. Beautiful machine I worked on a lot (5spd trans, lift, exhaust, gas tank) but it needed more power. The FJ-60 replaced an absolutely bottom basic 4cyl 4wd 5spd manual Toy "Pickup", better than a jeep 'cause you could carry shit off road, that the child outgrew sittin…

Hell Yeah V8 TRD rep I am thinking of upgrading to a Toyota Land Cruiser 200 but the full cab Hilux just can’t be beat

LC 200: 381HP V8 lol! Holy shit they are expensive used. It kinda looks like the updated version of the FJ-80 public "Mall Cruiser" actual knower "Land Crusher" concept, where the thing that looks like yer regular suburban kid hauler has got some serious off road chops. Used "Mall Cruiser" FJ-80s were considered a steal for many years.

Re: Toyotas and Terrorists: "Why are ISIS's trucks better than ours?" (2023)

#115

Post by esalman »

bwv848 wrote: post #63
pavel_lishin wrote: post #3

> It is also a very robust vehicle capable of withstanding elemental and physical extremities, as shown on the British TV show “Top Gear.”[6] If you haven't ever watched Top Gear, this is definitely one of the standout bits they did - putting that truck through absolute hell, and watching it continue to start up. I highly recommend it, even if you don't think of yourself as a Car Guy. It's basically a comedy show tha…

I don’t doubt how tough the Hilux can be, but Top Gear tended to stage a lot of things. Like they intentionally killed Hammond’s Land Cruiser at the end of the Bolivia special. Plus, they had some pretty damn good mechanics, while Clarkson pretended to fix his cars with a hammer in front of the camera.

I think there's a grand tour segment specifically addressing people who complain about a car show being staged.

Edit: it's S2E4 "Unscripted".

Re: Toyotas and Terrorists: "Why are ISIS's trucks better than ours?" (2023)

#116

Post by esaym »

bwv848 wrote: post #63
pavel_lishin wrote: post #3

> It is also a very robust vehicle capable of withstanding elemental and physical extremities, as shown on the British TV show “Top Gear.”[6] If you haven't ever watched Top Gear, this is definitely one of the standout bits they did - putting that truck through absolute hell, and watching it continue to start up. I highly recommend it, even if you don't think of yourself as a Car Guy. It's basically a comedy show tha…

I don’t doubt how tough the Hilux can be, but Top Gear tended to stage a lot of things. Like they intentionally killed Hammond’s Land Cruiser at the end of the Bolivia special. Plus, they had some pretty damn good mechanics, while Clarkson pretended to fix his cars with a hammer in front of the camera.

Try this one: https://youtu.be/Yl1FNX08HFc

Re: Toyotas and Terrorists: "Why are ISIS's trucks better than ours?" (2023)

#117

Post by TitaRusell »

tinfoilhatter wrote: post #82

Because ISIS was a rebranded Al Quaeda which emerged from the Mujahideen terrorist group which was funded by the US through Operation Cyclone headed by the Polish Jesuit Zbigniew Brzezinski. They've always had funding from the Jesuits / US war industry. It's no surprise they have access to these vehicles if one understands that all modern wars are orchestrated.

Not just modern wars. Hell the American Revolution was funded and supplied by France and the Netherlands- the colonies at that time did not have the industrial capability to outfit an army.

Every conflict in the history of man has people operating in the shadows.

Re: Toyotas and Terrorists: "Why are ISIS's trucks better than ours?" (2023)

#119

Post by beAbU »

bwv848 wrote: post #63
pavel_lishin wrote: post #3

> It is also a very robust vehicle capable of withstanding elemental and physical extremities, as shown on the British TV show “Top Gear.”[6] If you haven't ever watched Top Gear, this is definitely one of the standout bits they did - putting that truck through absolute hell, and watching it continue to start up. I highly recommend it, even if you don't think of yourself as a Car Guy. It's basically a comedy show tha…

I don’t doubt how tough the Hilux can be, but Top Gear tended to stage a lot of things. Like they intentionally killed Hammond’s Land Cruiser at the end of the Bolivia special. Plus, they had some pretty damn good mechanics, while Clarkson pretended to fix his cars with a hammer in front of the camera.

That hilux was basically just getting warmed up on top gear. They are indeed formiddable.

Re: Toyotas and Terrorists: "Why are ISIS's trucks better than ours?" (2023)

#120

Post by AndrewKemendo »

downut wrote: post #114
AndrewKemendo wrote: post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hell Yeah V8 TRD rep I am thinking of upgrading to a Toyota Land Cruiser 200 but the full cab Hilux just can’t be beat

LC 200: 381HP V8 lol! Holy shit they are expensive used. It kinda looks like the updated version of the FJ-80 public "Mall Cruiser" actual knower "Land Crusher" concept, where the thing that looks like yer regular suburban kid hauler has got some serious off road chops. Used "Mall Cruiser" FJ-80s were considered a steal for many years.

Yeah $100k for 100k miles is crazy work, but those things will do 1Mm miles in harsh terrain
Post reply on HN