Live data from Hacker News

Jellyfin LLM/"AI" Development Policy

jellyfin.org

111–112 of 112 posts

Re: Jellyfin LLM/"AI" Development Policy

#111
post #71

I know this is nothing new, but it's insane that we need policies like "When talking to us you have to use human words, not copy pasted LLM output" and "You must understand the code you're committing." When I was young, I used to think I'd be open minded to changing times and never be curmudgeonly, but I get into one "conversation" where someone responds with ChatGPT, and I am officially a curmudgeon.

They’ll self-sort pretty quickly. The ChatGPT people will talk to the ChatGPT people and be happy about it. I think it’ll work out.

The root of the issue is "ChatGPT people" are using artificial intelligence to replace... intelligence. Nobody, not even ChatGPT people, wants to actually read that drivel.

Re: Jellyfin LLM/"AI" Development Policy

#112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Humans are insanely good at figuring out intent and context I wish that was true.

It is true lol, that's our whole thing as a species.

Not my experience in human discourse. Most people have a very, very hard time seeing beyond their own assumptions and biases and reading the actual context and intent.
Post reply on HN