Live data from Hacker News

Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

dell.com

111–120 of 370 posts

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#111

Very large monitors are amazing. I’ve been rocking a single OLED 48” monitor for my MacBook Air M3. It is killer and I can not go back to smaller screen sizes. I just wish it was 6K or 8K instead of my current 4K. And if I do upgrade it will be to a 52/55”.

How far are you sitting from that monitor then?

I'm only like 2 feet from my monitor so it doesn't make sense to go any bigger than 30"

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It'd be pretty interesting to compare how much the amount of information one can cram onto their ~27" screen has changed between 2005 and 2025, with the comparison points between between a Mac running OS X 10.6 and a Mac running macOS 26, which I think is a particularly salient and apples-to-apples comparison since Apple was selling 30" 2560x1600 displays back then, which are close cousins to modern 27" 2560x1440 dis…

It would be interesting but I don't think that information density necessarily makes a good interface. As a personal pet peeve example, developers love to cram a search bar (or browser tabs) into the top of the window. It's more dense but it's also harder to use and drag the window.

True. More accurately, it's a combination of high density, judicial allocation of whitespace, and layouts that have been thought through. The 2000s versions of OS X were better in those regards too, though.

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#116
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have a 40in 5k (32in 4k, but wider). IMHO, 138ppi is the bare minimum, but it really depends on a person's eyesight and preferences. I would love a large-ish ultra-wide with > 160ppi. One day, maybe, that being said, by that time those things will exist and be reasonably priced, my eyes might not be able to appreciate the difference.

I'm using three 4k 32" screens arranged vertically, for 6480 x 3840 desktop size. The only real monitor upgrade I'm willing to entertain is a ~50" 8k curved screen (basically a curved TV-sized screen), which has not been made yet AFAIK. I'm not into "ultrawide", for me it has to be "ultrawide" and "ultratall". I want all that screen real estate in high PPI. I tried test-driving a 50" 4k TV for a week and the flatness…

100% I used to have a 43-inch 4K "monitor" (16:9). The lack of curvature meant that at the sides of the screen, there was noticeable color shifting due to variations in viewing angle. That's with an IPS panel.

Your dream is probably a ~50in 8K TV (with RGB pattern if you are on macOS), but curved. I don't know if that will ever exist.

Personally, I found that with a bigger 16:9, I would not use the top and bottom of the screen. When I "downgraded" to a 40in ultra-wide, there was not much difference in the space I was using.

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#117
post #21

This has pixels the size of my hand, and it fully covers my field of view. Not my cup of tea. What I do recommend (having bought one) is the Kuycon G32p, 32 inches @ 6K. Incredible quality and unbelievable value for money ( https://clickclack.io/products/in-stock-kuycon-g32p-6k-32-in... ).

> pixels the size of my hand

Sometimes this is refreshing. (display joke there, heh)

this is a big monitor.

Many UIs don't scale particularly well with very high resolution. So you get UI elements with super-fine text or icons.

Some linux console fonts are almost unreadable with just 4k, though recent releases seem to be addressing this.

also old games.

for comparison, I think this is basically the dell 43" monitor with pixels on each side (16:9 -> 21:9)

the height of the panel is similar, the width is higher (plus curvature)

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#118
post #21

This has pixels the size of my hand, and it fully covers my field of view. Not my cup of tea. What I do recommend (having bought one) is the Kuycon G32p, 32 inches @ 6K. Incredible quality and unbelievable value for money ( https://clickclack.io/products/in-stock-kuycon-g32p-6k-32-in... ).

clickclack?? sounds like a shady referral link. will not click.

On the official Kuycon site, it says "Since 2023, Kuycon has partnered exclusively with ClickClack.io to bring its innovative line of monitors to customers outside of China[...]". I'm seriously considering getting one of these.

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#119
post #34

I have a 34" ultrawide and it is huge. I can't imagine a 52" - the edges would be so far away that it must be hard to read text without physically moving left/right

Do you... usually read content in a full-screen window on that thing? I only have a 27" monitor and sit about 2.5 feet away from it and I move my head _slightly_ to focus on different windows. But that's the reason I have a larger monitor, so I can have a bunch of normal-sized windows open at once.

I like having three columns of code open in my editor, but the left edge of the leftmost column (since code is left-justified) gets pretty far away from my face. Or I need stronger glasses, one of the two.

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#120
post #21

This has pixels the size of my hand, and it fully covers my field of view. Not my cup of tea. What I do recommend (having bought one) is the Kuycon G32p, 32 inches @ 6K. Incredible quality and unbelievable value for money ( https://clickclack.io/products/in-stock-kuycon-g32p-6k-32-in... ).

You must have really tiny hands considering the pixels are smaller that .2mm by .2mm
Post reply on HN