Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah you can bet the Fuck Tree wouldn't make it into any encyclopedia.
Have you considered that you just aren’t reading the cool encyclopedias?
List of individual trees
111–117 of 117 posts
Re: List of individual trees
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s Wikipedia. Make the change you want to see in the page.
"It’s Wikipedia. Make the change you want to see in the page." If it allows you to edit it in the first place or isn't reverted within five minutes.
Re: List of individual trees
#113One of Wikipedia’s greatest contributions is collecting records like this that wouldn’t appear in a traditional encyclopedia.
Re: List of individual trees
#114Mine is the Jollyman Oak, which stood in Jollyman Park on Stelling Road, Cupertino and was 160 years old before residential re-development crushed its root system.
I heard about its death via Facebook.
Re: List of individual trees
#115Re: List of individual trees
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
My dumb butt thought it was gonna be a list of every tree in the world, all eight gazillion of them
This is a map of all trees in the Netherlands https://boomregister.nl/overzichtskaart-van-de-bomen-in-nede...
Re: List of individual trees
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wikipedia is and has always been a wiki; reverting bad or controversial edits has always been expected from day one. Also Wikipedia has developed an editorial line of its own, so it's normal that edits that go against the line will be put in question; if that happens to you, you're expected to collaborate in the talk pages to express your intent for the changes, and possibly get recommendations on how to tweak it so…
> reverting bad or controversial edits has always been expected from day one. How charming of you to think that the well-meaning contributor is going to happily smile and agree with you when you tell them that their well-meaning contributions are bad.