Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
I think ad hominems are fine when the lunatic in question mail bombs and injures/murders innocent people. Like what the eff are you talking about!?
[flagged]
ICE is using facial-recognition technology to quickly arrest people
111–120 of 213 posts
Re: ICE is using facial-recognition technology to quickly arrest people
#112Re: ICE is using facial-recognition technology to quickly arrest people
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nothing about this forum is distinguished. Are you being serious? It's just reddit for tech nerds with the same problems
The moderation team makes all the difference in the world.
The moderation team makes no difference on how people here interact with each other and the posts.
Re: ICE is using facial-recognition technology to quickly arrest people
#114Re: ICE is using facial-recognition technology to quickly arrest people
#115Re: ICE is using facial-recognition technology to quickly arrest people
#116We've been building a turn key police state for the past 25 years.
Re: ICE is using facial-recognition technology to quickly arrest people
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
[flagged]
First: Much of your post is against site guidelines. You should perhaps re-read them.
Second: My opinion of Kaczynski is colored by having met one of his bombing victims, both before and after.
More generally, he is philosophizing about what is good for society. That is, he's making claims about what is moral. But his actions show that his moral compass is hopelessly skewed. So why am I going to take his judgment on moral questions? I'm not. As a philosopher on moral questions, his actions destroy his credibility.
His ideas may sound credible. If that's where they led him, though, no, I don't want to start down the road of his ideas.
Re: ICE is using facial-recognition technology to quickly arrest people
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think ad hominems are fine when the lunatic in question mail bombs and injures/murders innocent people. Like what the eff are you talking about!?
[flagged]
Given how many impactful books I've read by both small and large authors, even before the age of the internet, I'd say this murderous fuckwit was simply justifying murder.
This does not justify murder. Had his moronic ramblings been worth the paper it was printed on, the murders would not be necessary to spread it.
Re: ICE is using facial-recognition technology to quickly arrest people
#119Re: ICE is using facial-recognition technology to quickly arrest people
#120Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are many unresolved gray areas around what exactly the 4th amendment permits in the way of what United States v. Knotts called "dragnet-type law enforcement practices". Knotts suggested they might not be permitted, even if they were made up of permissible individual parts, but didn't elaborate. More recent case law has held, for example, that cell phone companies turning over large quantities of records is a 4t…
From what I understand, this isn’t so much a “dragnet” operation involving combing through mass quantities of records on demand; it’s more like “this person is in public in my field of view, and I want to know who they are.” More importantly, though, the cases so far have focused on the investigative activity that follows once a suspect has been identified. Here, we’re talking about de-anonymization: identifying one…
I don't have to identify myself to police where I live. That's why, in my opinion, this is an unreasonable use of technology. I'm not sure what qualifies under the fourteenth but force-ably identifying me when I don't want to be and not required to seems unreasonable.