I have a hard time taking someone with the title of “CTO” seriously if they have no reports and have time to code instead of being concerned with strategy. I’ve had a few “opportunities” to be a “CTO” that were really no more than a glorified, underpaid senior developer with the promise of “equity” that would probably be meaningless
In their defence, I can see "no direct reports" perhaps referring more to the line managerial side than code responsibility. However a few things stood out in this to me. > So pushing new ideas is quite important because they require intentional, sustained effort. Between org structure, roadmap incentives, and limited risk budget, few engineers can take months to pursue ambiguous bets. That's exactly the kind of thin…
As a leader, especially a CxO, the most important job they have is the allocation of resources. It was clearly NOT valuable if they couldn't apply any developer time towards it.