The author lacks imagination or is not arguing entirely in good faith: > I realised that knowing about my website visitors had zero effect on anything in the real world. Perhaps that's true for them? But you don't have to try too hard to think of legitimate reasons why basic analytics are useful to any blog author who is trying to increase their reach, like knowing what topics are of most interest to their audience,…
A blog does not need “analytics”
111–113 of 113 posts
Re: A blog does not need “analytics”
#1121. Yes 2. I use SimpleAnalytics 3. I think Search Console is useful 4. But then, really? PS: Over the last year, my impression in search more than doubled, my clicks fell 75% #AgeOfAI
How do you find Search Console useful and how is that relative to collecting analytics? Just curious, I've only used Search Console in the manner of validating how pages are returned when searching and validating page metadata is correct. I realize that Google may require you to drain data into Search Console to use it or something, but I'm not sure how the data may be useful for the Search Console functionality.
Re: A blog does not need “analytics”
#113The author lacks imagination or is not arguing entirely in good faith: > I realised that knowing about my website visitors had zero effect on anything in the real world. Perhaps that's true for them? But you don't have to try too hard to think of legitimate reasons why basic analytics are useful to any blog author who is trying to increase their reach, like knowing what topics are of most interest to their audience,…
The essay seems unhinged. Data is useful. What the hell is wrong with that?!?