Live data from Hacker News

How Boom uses software to accelerate hardware development

bscholl.substack.com

111–112 of 112 posts

Re: How Boom uses software to accelerate hardware development

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From [4]: > Rolls-Royce's work over the last few years So Rolls sank several years of investigation into it before cutting their losses. From [3]: > Boom aims for production of the engine to begin in 2025 at the Overture factory at Greensboro, North Carolina Mark your calendar ...

It seems developing a new engine a relatively rare, difficult, expensive, and risky endeavor in aviation. Notice none of the aircraft companies make their own, right? It's CFM, PW, and RR. But Boom has a bunch of propulsion engineer openings so it looks like they're really going for it.

The saying in aviation is "don't develop a new airframe and a new powerplant at the same time".

Sure there are counterexamples, but they have good reasons to think that this is more than double the difficulty of developing one of these parts. And that the engine will take longer.

Re: How Boom uses software to accelerate hardware development

#112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah. The demonstrator was to validate some basic concepts they were promoting about being able to achieve supersonic flight without supersonic booms. It achieved that at relatively low cost, and gave them something to brag about, an indication of baseline competence at certifying airframes and possibly ticked off some investor boxes. There wasn't much more to be learned about large passenger jets using their intende…

I wonder what kind of liability it would be to sell a one-off prototype plane like that. Guessing it would also have more value has a model in the lobby or on a pole outside headquarters one day than they would earn in selling it.

It's hard to see why anyone would pick an airplane like this over a surplus, demilitarized fighter jet (only one of them has spare parts)
Post reply on HN