Not sorry, I don't trust anything with Trump's name attached to it. I have to live here, but I don't have to like it, or trust him or anyone attached to him.
OpenAI for Countries
111–120 of 219 posts
Re: OpenAI for Countries
#112This is simultaneously why most people desperately want to invest in OpenAI and at the same time why all the best gen AI researchers want to work for anthropic. The less you understand the more impressive this seems. Conversley the more you understand the more embarrassing this seems.
Can you give more detail on this? Or this is a vibe comment? Who do you consider as “best”?
Re: OpenAI for Countries
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don’t forget the training data!
We are far from open training data... training data might even be incriminating.
100%, though I still feel as though open training data will eventually become a thing. It'll have to be mostly new data, synthetic data, or meticulously curated from public domain / open data.
Synthetic training data sets, even robotically-acquired real world "synthetic" data, can rapidly create training sets. It's just a matter of coordinating these efforts and building high quality data.
I've made a few data sets using Unreal Engine, and I've been wanting to put various objects on turn tables and go out on backpack 3D scan adventures.
Someone will have to pay for it, though.
Re: OpenAI for Countries
#114This is for the Gulf states.
Re: OpenAI for Countries
#115This is so tone deaf that it’s embarrassing. And to liken OpenAI as democratic is beyond ignorant, it’s deceitful
Re: OpenAI for Countries
#116[deleted]
Re: OpenAI for Countries
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's because there are no consequences for bad behavior, only reward. Game theory dictates that if bad behavior is a winning strategy it will be adopted and propagate until it is the dominant strategy. The only way it stops becoming a winning strategy is if we provide consequences, but that requires taking personal responsibility for the state of the world, which was a core American value, but doesn't seem to be an…
The only way out is to hold executives personally responsible for the actions of their companies, and politicians for the results of their policy. Sam Altman should receive the same treatment as Aaron Swartz. Actually, he should be punished much more severely since the scope of his copyright infringement makes Aaron's seem like child's play.
Darn, that’s a brutal but quite fair and honest assessment
Re: OpenAI for Countries
#118> We’ve heard from many countries asking for help in building out similar AI infrastructure—that they want their own Stargates and similar projects.
Who is this for exactly? The thing about reneging on your agreements and treaties and threatening and demonizing everyone around you is that they learn not to trust you. US-led AI sounds terrible, it would never pass muster in Canada. Neither in the EU, China, India, Brazil... Like, you Cannot entrust your governments functioning on the US anymore, you can just get cut off at any point for no reason.
So who's this for?
Re: OpenAI for Countries
#119Reminds me of Meta mobile data partnerships in Myanmar. Same arguments and similar playbook. That did not go well for people in Myanmar.
Re: OpenAI for Countries
#120Earlier quoted context omitted.
Diametrically opposed? They are distinct, but hardly opposed.
Well I guess the time scale is what determines the degree to which the distinction becomes opposition. AI is likely to persist for tens or hundreds of thousands of years in some form. Are any of today's nation states built to last that long? I think we all know the answer. If you have AI which is in the service of an entity which proclaims itself to be the sole franchise of government authority over a given landmass,…
I agree that “AI for governments” is much more accurate, just saying that diametrically opposed doesn’t really capture the relationship between the two concepts well