Live data from Hacker News

Bond rout starting to sound market alarm bells

reuters.com

111–115 of 115 posts

Re: Bond rout starting to sound market alarm bells

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It's hard to say where the lower bound for the value of American companies is now. Is it zero? Come on, it's definitely not zero for most of the companies, even if tons of small businesses go bankrupt. > But the current administration seems to be set on redirecting those earnings away from investors towards the government. And I don't see what could limit the extent to which they do so. The objective of the current…

Companies can operate and make profit Why make a profit? How is an Apple that gives billions of dollars to investors (many of them abroad) better for Trump than an Apple that gives those billions of dollars to the Government which he controls? Tariffs are one way to redirect those profits.

> Apple that gives billions of dollars to investors (many of them abroad)

Yeah and much of the revenue comes from abroad too. You could at least try to show a balanced view

  the U.S. still counts for around 40 percent of Apple’s net sales

Re: Bond rout starting to sound market alarm bells

#112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Trump has talked about his tariff idea since the 80s, and talked to Oprah about it way back when we lived in a completely different world. I'm not sure his 80s era plan is based on 2025 dynamics that somehow filtered up to him in his first months of office.

Fair point. It's reasonable to conclude that a lot of the impetus is coming from Trump himself. On the other hand, the Biden admin quietly kept Trump's first-term China tariffs, even though they reversed many other Trump policies. So that suggests some involvement of the wider foreign policy establishment that's continuous over changing administrations

Or just shows that anti-China sentiment is politically popular in the U.S.

Re: Bond rout starting to sound market alarm bells

#113
post #110
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> there isn't a reasonable path to them paying the money back Indefinite rollover is completely fine! Yes there are problems if the total interest payment gets too large, and there's scope for discussion about that, but there's no hard cutoff, it just becomes more and more uncomfortable. People saying there will be a default: deadline please. Or is this just a general assumption that mortality is inevitable for state…

It isn't completely fine and the interest payments are too large. Sure the US can afford its debts if it avoids paying fair interest and never returns the principle. The idea that is reasonable from a lender's perspective is fantasy and we live in reality. > The UK has never defaulted, for example. The UK has traditionally not been in a state of running up debts; they borrowed money for things like world wars then sp…

> never returns the principle

But it does! All the bonds pay out after X years, and everyone is completely fine with this.

> The UK has traditionally not been in a state of running up debts; they borrowed money for things like world wars then spent most of their time paying loans down. The US isn't behaving like a creditworthy country because they borrow to consume and they aren't attempting to shrink the debt.

You've not looked at the numbers, have you.

Re: Bond rout starting to sound market alarm bells

#114
post #113
post #110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It isn't completely fine and the interest payments are too large. Sure the US can afford its debts if it avoids paying fair interest and never returns the principle. The idea that is reasonable from a lender's perspective is fantasy and we live in reality. > The UK has never defaulted, for example. The UK has traditionally not been in a state of running up debts; they borrowed money for things like world wars then sp…

> never returns the principle But it does! All the bonds pay out after X years, and everyone is completely fine with this. > The UK has traditionally not been in a state of running up debts; they borrowed money for things like world wars then spent most of their time paying loans down. The US isn't behaving like a creditworthy country because they borrow to consume and they aren't attempting to shrink the debt. You'v…

> But it does! All the bonds pay out after X years, and everyone is completely fine with this.

I'm happy to argue with you but you're going to have to read the entire sentence. Possibly even the entire paragraph. Otherwise it is a bit pointless even for the fun of it.

> You've not looked at the numbers, have you.

I have, I put a good 5-10 minutes in to it. I suspect you haven't looked at the numbers.

You can find references on places like the BBC [0] but there are also charts that go back to the 1800s and the story is reasonably consistent. Historically most years the UK pays down debt. In fact, the last time it didn't was the 1930s and after that klutzy fumble it didn't get to be an empire any more, so that was a mistake.

[0] https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/ace/standard/800/cpsprodpb/16CB7/pr...

Re: Bond rout starting to sound market alarm bells

#115

There are several things at play. 1) Trump is playing a storyline. The Market place of ideas in America has one side which is under a monopoly. It sets its own prices, decides what information enters and exits, decides what the market SHOULD look like. It manages half the voting population. This is why “Trump does what he says” resonated. Previous lawmakers played the role on TV, but in back room deals, acted as if r…

> If Americans want a snowballs chance in hell, there need to be special elections around the country in 2025, to take control of congress. Perhaps, though I don't see how you're going to get them without changing or violating the Constitution. And changing the Constitution would mean acceptance by those you're trying to get rid of. Bluntly, the only way this could happen is a civil war - a real, shooting civil war,…

Glad someone said it.

A special election is a dumb idea.

Post reply on HN