Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ye, brother
Right? This is hacker news, not reddit. Whether one finds their stance silly or not, one should respect that real people are making real decisions to skip a conference. This isn't a meme. Our country is being destroyed and I don't mind some foreigners putting pressure on our society to get our shit together.
Boycott IETF 127
111–120 of 412 posts
Re: Boycott IETF 127
#112Re: Boycott IETF 127
#113> Some have been tortured. Any reputable news sources for this?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/19/canadian-det...
Re: Boycott IETF 127
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
Depends on when the conference is scheduled, but Mexico has some world renewed venues at the seaside - say Cancun- that nobody minds visiting when it’s winter at home. :-)
I work for a US company that almost exclusively hosts internal get-togethers in Cancun. It's much better value for money than anywhere in the US.
Re: Boycott IETF 127
#115Re: Boycott IETF 127
#116[flagged]
> This is just activist extremism. There’s no threat to anyone’s safety. The US is perfectly safe to visit. Except the link you're responding to is literally linking to reports of threats to safety. > Activists who are in opposition to the US presidency are overreacting to a few lone cases of people being detained at borders without knowing the details of those situations. We know more than enough to point out that i…
Typically when you break laws in a country, for example violating the terms of a visa, you face consequences. For everyone else, there’s no issue. But none of this is a “threat to safety”. Again, this is activist hyperbole.
> We know more than enough to point out that it shouldn't have happened at all.
You don’t know any real details. You just have vague claims from individuals that likely were breaking the law, and partisan news media amplifying their claims with zero investigation. There is no evidence of why these people were questioned or detained. We know at least a couple of the cases involve explicitly violating immigration law - visa overstays, attempts to cross the border after a denial, working while on a travel visa, etc.
> The Guardian is a centre-left outlet, not a far-left outlet.
Re: Boycott IETF 127
#117Re: Boycott IETF 127
#118Re: Boycott IETF 127
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
In a historical context “wellness farms” is understood as a euphemism for concentration camp. It’s free but you can’t leave.
If you talk to a parent of a child who OD'd, most commonly of fent these days, they all have this thought. What if I took them somewhere remote where there are no drugs and didn't let them leave? My heart hurts for them, but I have no idea if it's a good idea or not. Regardless, I think his heart is in the right place. Time will tell whether or not it's actually useful.
I've been in max security prisons. There are generally far more drugs inside these than I've ever seen in the outside world.
I don't want to piss on rehab too much, it can work. But for every decent rehab facility there are probably 100 bogus ones.
Also remember, that to an addict who has been to prison, rehab feels like prison. It has the same locked-down, heavy-on-the-rules design that can cause serious PTSD issues for (practically everyone) who suffers some sort of trauma from being incarcerated.
Re: Boycott IETF 127
#120Is this a parody? > Beyond problems at the border, the current Secretary for Health and Human Services - Robert F. Kennedy Jr. - has said that he will send those with ADHD to camps. Source: Futurism. What he actually said: > "I’m going to dedicate that revenue to creating wellness farms — drug rehabilitation farms, in rural areas all over this country," he said during the podcast. "I’m going to make it so people can…