Live data from Hacker News

London's Heathrow Airport announces complete shutdown due to power outage

cnn.com

111–120 of 260 posts

Re: London's Heathrow Airport announces complete shutdown due to power outage

#111
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Heathrow is massive and uses a lot of power (1-2MWh/day). That number doesn't seem that high, compared to a single high-speed train running at about 300kph or above. Or lets say all of the London Tube/DLR. Seems like nothing, actually.

Yeah, that can't be right. You can tow a 100 kW generator (2.4 MWh/day) with a pickup truck.

[0] suggests (without a useful link and my searching has not found one) that Heathrow is doing 460GWh annually. Presumably[1] that equates to 1.25GWh daily (which could be where the 1-2MWh/day came from - a simple unit error)?

[0] https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2025-03-21/heathr...

[1] I know precisely nothing about power consumption of large systems but dividing the annual figure by 365 seems plausible.

Re: London's Heathrow Airport announces complete shutdown due to power outage

#112

This is way worse due to London airports' lack of spare capacity. They should have built Thames Estuary Airport a long time ago.

I feel like if you build that extra capacity it will immediately get used and you will still have no extra capacity in these situations. An airport holding extra capacity feels like it's just burning money given the demand.

Re: London's Heathrow Airport announces complete shutdown due to power outage

#113

Seems like a national security issue if there’s a single point of failure a few miles away that can take down one of Europe’s largest airports and global air travel.

Why would it be a national security issue? Military airports are working fine. National security doesn't rely on civilian airports. And communications networks aren't disrupted or anything. This isn't enabling terrorism. It's absolutely a huge economic issue. Economic-political. But I'm not seeing a national security angle here.

Most militarily-significant targets are themselves non-military.

The Russian war of aggression on Ukraine is a prime example: power infrastructure, transportation, communications, commercial hubs, healthcare, and general civilian targets of opportunity are all targeted with high frequency by Russian forces.

UK national security interests are spelled out in summary beginning on page 5 of this PDF, "Government Functional Standard: GovS 007: Security", notably

Each organisation’s governance and management framework shall cover physical, personnel, cyber, incident management, technical and industry security

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/613a195bd3bf7...> (PDF)

The US electric grid has also been of significant concern. Ted Koppel's book Lights Out (2015) addressed this specificly:

https://news.wttw.com/2015/11/09/ted-koppel-americas-vulnera...>

As an example of non-military focus, the present US national security policy leads with ... tourist visas:

To protect Americans, the United States must be vigilant during the visa-issuance process to ensure that those aliens approved for admission into the United States do not intend to harm Americans or our national interests.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/prot...> (20 Jan 2025)

An earlier document from the Bush II White House leads with:

People everywhere want to be able to speak freely; choose who will govern them; worship as they please; educate their children—male and female; own property; and enjoy the benefits of their labor.

https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/nsc/nssall.html> (2002)

Wikipedia's National Security article notes:

Originally conceived as protection against military attack, national security is widely understood to include also non-military dimensions, such as the security from terrorism, minimization of crime, economic security, energy security, environmental security, food security, and cyber-security.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_security>

Re: London's Heathrow Airport announces complete shutdown due to power outage

#114

They didn't have enough solar panels on the roof?

You joke but make a good point, most major installations have backup diesel powered generators to provide power for a certain limited but generous time. What happened with Heathrows generators? Did they kick in? Do they have any? Edits: yes they did kick in as normal https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/heathrow-ed-miliband-nati... Note that usually backup generators are only for essentials like air traffic control, la…

That’s what I was wondering. Strange, that they didn’t plan to run the whole airport. Compared to construction costs and costs of disruption…

Re: London's Heathrow Airport announces complete shutdown due to power outage

#115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Heathrow is a significant part of the UK economy Is it, really ? From Heathrow's own website[1], so we can expect figures on the "generous" side: "Heathrow Airport is expected to contribute approximately £4.7bn to the UK economy " This incident started somewhere around midnight and is currently estimated to be resolved by 15:00. So let's round that up to "one day". £4.7bn divided by 365 is £12.8m Compared to say, t…

I've flown through Heathrow a dozen or so times, and have spent maybe $200 in various shops and restaurants. Outside the airport, I spent months working on projects, and both I and the projects involved much more than $200. An analysis that includes only direct spending misses the overall impact.

All right, but if Heathrow was down for a day, what would you do? Cancel the trip, and never go at all? Or would you go a day later, or through a different airport, or fly to Manchester and take the train?

Re: London's Heathrow Airport announces complete shutdown due to power outage

#116
post #94

Funny, how we're all suddenly privy to highly classified information. Yesterday, if you'd have publicly shared this one substation is enough to take down Heathrow for an entire day, you'd have been disappeared by the British spooks for sharing extremely sensitive information threatening national security and you'd probably end up behind bars for over a decade. Today, we all just know because it happened to catch fire…

This kind of information has been available via open data for ages, and it isn't exactly hard for a foreign power with boots on the ground to figure out either.

With this kind of large-scale infrastructure it just isn't viable to rely on security through obscurity. If you want to protect against failure, invest in redundancy.

Re: London's Heathrow Airport announces complete shutdown due to power outage

#117
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Seems like a national security issue if there’s a single point of failure No. Its not. Its the fact that the decades of under-investment in power distribution infrastructure is coming home to roost. Its no secret there's little to no "fat" in the UK grid system. Hence it has difficulty coping with black-swan events such as this. Anyone who buys datacentre space in London knows the reason prices have gone through th…

So .. why are people trying to build new datacentre space in London rather than somewhere a bit further away and less expensive? Easier to put the datacentre near the power and run some fiber rather than the other way round, surely? The expense is unpleasant, but the money has to come from somewhere, and the user paying is easier to justify than all the other bill-payers collectively or the taxpayer.

> why are people trying to build new datacentre space in London rather than somewhere a bit further away and less expensive?

Most likely some combination of:

    1. A chunk of the customer base (financial sector, hyperscalers etc.) that wants the low latency and who are price insensitive because of their deep pockets.
    2. If peering matters to you, then you're limited to where the IXP is, which is usually only at the major London sites.  LINX, for example, have LINX Wales, but that is not interconnected with LINX London, so you either need to get space in London or pay for fibre capacity back to London.
    3. Fibre coverage outside large conurbations in the UK has traditionally been shit and to varying degrees still is.
    4. The rural areas don't have substations ready-to-go and the NIMBY's come running if you propose building one or anything else in their backyards (see protests about new wind farms).
Almost certainly many more things I've missed, those are just a few off the top of my head.

There are various locations outside of Central London but within the M25 boundary. But YMMV when it comes to being any less expensive. I suspect you will find the Outer London market has "hardened" over the last few years.

Verging into cynical territory, marketing might come into it a little bit. "Telehouse London" sounds cooler in the customer presentation "Telehouse near some village you've never heard of".

Re: London's Heathrow Airport announces complete shutdown due to power outage

#118
post #88
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That and the sunken ship full of explosives, yes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Richard_Montgomery#/media/F...

I can think of a very quick way to make those explosives safe!

According to a BBC News report in 1970,[12] it was determined that if the wreck of Richard Montgomery exploded, it would throw a 300 metres (980 feet)-wide column of water and debris nearly 3,000 metres (9,800 feet) into the air and generate a wave 5 metres (16 feet) high. Almost every window in Sheerness (population circa 20,000) would be broken and buildings would be damaged by the blast

Re: London's Heathrow Airport announces complete shutdown due to power outage

#119
post #93
post #87

Is the power outage due to the fire? If so, what was the fire due to? How far back do we need to go on this? the Big Bang?

Old oil transformer. The insulation breaks down in old transformers. It happens sometimes. No need to involve Russian conspiracy theories at this point in time... :-) "How to Prevent Substation Fires": https://www.oilbarriers.com/blog/suppress-substation-fires/ https://youtu.be/2np745xyQ7o

It could be an old transformer, but it is not known at this time.

Re: London's Heathrow Airport announces complete shutdown due to power outage

#120
post #88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can think of a very quick way to make those explosives safe!

It's enough explosive to cause a 2m high tsunami in the estuary, iirc. Not an option.

That is absolutely an option which other sane nations would consider.

Issue a Tsunami warning and get everyone off the beach for an hour Sunday at 3am.

Post reply on HN