Live data from Hacker News

South Korean regulator accuses DeepSeek of sharing user data with ByteDance

bbc.com

111–120 of 146 posts

Re: South Korean regulator accuses DeepSeek of sharing user data with ByteDance

#111
post #31

Some missing context is that the data is shared via the DeepSeek app's use of ByteDance analytics/configuration frameworks. So not a backroom deal where DeekSeek handed over the chat history for its user base, but rather ongoing analytics data being sent from the DeepSeek mobile app. Here's the SecurityScoreCard article that brought attention to this: https://securityscorecard.com/blog/a-deep-peek-at-deepseek/#... Be…

[dead]

Re: South Korean regulator accuses DeepSeek of sharing user data with ByteDance

#112
post #14

... in the same way a lot of website in this world 'shared user data' with Google. Through Google Analytics. Yeah, believe it or not. ByteDance has a cloud offering. And it includes a frontend APM product. And DeepSeek used that. How surprising! A Chinese company used a Chinese cloud. Oh, and chat.deepseek.com resolve to a Huawei Cloud IP address in China. It resolves to Cloudflare outside of mainland China, but who…

> A Chinese company used a Chinese cloud.

Using a Chinese company for every thing except for distillation for which they used OpenAI lol.

Re: South Korean regulator accuses DeepSeek of sharing user data with ByteDance

#113
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, exactly, what the guy above was saying is that they're just looking for excuses to keep people from using the Chinese thing.

Protectionism can be dumb, if competition from china is decimation the US LLM market, making the cheaper better competitors illegal sounds like sound advice to someone like trump, probably?

All the major US tech firms are extremely competition averse. They are all cozying up to Trump so they can maintain their cartels.

Re: South Korean regulator accuses DeepSeek of sharing user data with ByteDance

#114
post #31

Some missing context is that the data is shared via the DeepSeek app's use of ByteDance analytics/configuration frameworks. So not a backroom deal where DeekSeek handed over the chat history for its user base, but rather ongoing analytics data being sent from the DeepSeek mobile app. Here's the SecurityScoreCard article that brought attention to this: https://securityscorecard.com/blog/a-deep-peek-at-deepseek/#... Be…

Interesting, but I don't think those details will be ameliorative to the people who are concerned (e.g. U.S. Congress). In fact, I wonder if it may further underscore their concerns, given that it surfaces the interconnectedness between all of these firms.

Would you say that US-based apps that use e.g. Google Analytics, and therefore share information with Google, "surface the interconnectedness between all of these firms" and are a good reason to e.g. ban apps from US-based developers?

Re: South Korean regulator accuses DeepSeek of sharing user data with ByteDance

#115
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People had the same theory for chatgpt, except rather than Xi and Tiananmen, it was how to make meth and anti-"woke" topics.

A US Tiananmen-comparable example would be ChatGPT censoring George Floyd's death or killing of Native Americans, etc. ChatGPT doesn't censor these topics

Huh? TPTB in the US do not try to censor those topics; if anything they encourage discussion of them (or at least did until this year). US "AI" systems censor much the same topics as US social networks, just as Chinese "AI" systems censor much the same topics as Chinese social networks.

Re: South Korean regulator accuses DeepSeek of sharing user data with ByteDance

#116

If they sold it, isn't that like what... literally almost every single company does nowadays unless you pay up?

I don't think so. You can't buy user data from Google or Facebook or Apple or Microsoft and they probably have more of it than anybody else.

You and I can't buy it because they don't want their competitors getting it. But they'll happily use it to target ads at you, and the US government has access to it and can use it to decide who they want to send their CIA kidnap-torture squads after.

Re: South Korean regulator accuses DeepSeek of sharing user data with ByteDance

#117
post #51

Shouldn't this be the other way around? TikTok has the most user data for any LLM to train with. I bet they will make a killing with it, unless of course the CCP decrees that they share it for free.

Firstly, Bytedance is far more than just Tiktok. Secondly, most data in China is shared among most companies anyway, because, firstly, the government (not necessarily CCP) orders most companies to share data with "technological leaders" and "strategically important" companies, and secondly because computer security is mostly an alien concept to Chinese. Copyright (broadly speaking, most restrictions on unrestricted d…

loads of rubbish XD The government does not know what data is important, and most time does not know who is technological leader

Re: South Korean regulator accuses DeepSeek of sharing user data with ByteDance

#118
you mean how every single US tech company shares data with Google and Meta? How you browse a website, and, in an instant, ads show in Meta products? "user behaviour and device metadata [are] likely sent to ByteDance servers", lol, all your user behavior and device metadata are sent to Google and Meta servers. South Korea too afraid to say the same thing about USA. And surprised Pikachu face about all the downvotes in this thread on users pointing out the same thing about US tech companies, lol, propaganda and ethnonationalism is a powerful force

Re: South Korean regulator accuses DeepSeek of sharing user data with ByteDance

#119
post #114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Interesting, but I don't think those details will be ameliorative to the people who are concerned (e.g. U.S. Congress). In fact, I wonder if it may further underscore their concerns, given that it surfaces the interconnectedness between all of these firms.

Would you say that US-based apps that use e.g. Google Analytics, and therefore share information with Google, "surface the interconnectedness between all of these firms" and are a good reason to e.g. ban apps from US-based developers?

Not the op, but yes, I would; this is why I approve of GDPR and the cookie popup rules and am actively angry at every company who think it's legit to share browsing habbits with more "trusted partner" companies than there were students in my secondary school.

Re: South Korean regulator accuses DeepSeek of sharing user data with ByteDance

#120
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At some point you have entered your car data while searching for another car part on Amazon. Amazon caches this information.

I've never entered ANY car data online. Most likely it was sold to Amazon by my insurance company

Nope.
Post reply on HN