Live data from Hacker News

Why is Warner Bros. Discovery putting old movies on YouTube?

tedium.co

111–120 of 485 posts

Re: Why is Warner Bros. Discovery putting old movies on YouTube?

#111
post #30

Old movies have been available on various "free ad-supported streaming television" for a while now, so I'm actually more surprised it took copyright holders that long to realize that Youtube also shows ads and doesn't require people to install some wonky app that might or might not be available for their platform. Of course, region-specific copyright deals are incredibly complex etc. etc., so I could imagine it was j…

Does YT offer more revenue than something like Tubi?

Re: Why is Warner Bros. Discovery putting old movies on YouTube?

#112
post #30

Old movies have been available on various "free ad-supported streaming television" for a while now, so I'm actually more surprised it took copyright holders that long to realize that Youtube also shows ads and doesn't require people to install some wonky app that might or might not be available for their platform. Of course, region-specific copyright deals are incredibly complex etc. etc., so I could imagine it was j…

[deleted]

Re: Why is Warner Bros. Discovery putting old movies on YouTube?

#113
post #30

Old movies have been available on various "free ad-supported streaming television" for a while now, so I'm actually more surprised it took copyright holders that long to realize that Youtube also shows ads and doesn't require people to install some wonky app that might or might not be available for their platform. Of course, region-specific copyright deals are incredibly complex etc. etc., so I could imagine it was j…

I assume that bandwidth is by far the biggest cost for running your own streaming service, so letting Google take that hit makes a lot of sense.

Ah, FAST services as referenced by the parent are an entire genre of streaming services that might have slipped under the radar for most Hacker News readers.[1] They’d be off my radar too since I’m not interested in them per se, but for Jason Snell’s excellent Downstream[2] podcast (earlier episodes co-hosted by Julia Alexander) covering basically the business of Hollywood with an emphasis on streaming services and rights.

So this is basically just using YouTube as a FAST service.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_ad-supported_streaming_te...

[2]: https://www.relay.fm/downstream

Re: Why is Warner Bros. Discovery putting old movies on YouTube?

#114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I assume that bandwidth is by far the biggest cost for running your own streaming service, so letting Google take that hit makes a lot of sense.

Don't let the cloud providers fool you. Bandwidth is cheap, especially for Googles, Netflixes and Cloudflares of the world which peer with every ISP that matters.

The reality of these relationships is more complex especially in some markets. It's also not hard to be at the IX and benefit yourself.

Re: Why is Warner Bros. Discovery putting old movies on YouTube?

#115

I don’t know about officially sanctioned releases, but I feel like I’ve watched entire movies through YouTube shorts at this point… there’s a really simple grift that rockets to the top of the algorithm and also pushes people into a pipeline for other clips of the movie: 1. Clip a movie scene and crop it for vertical aspect ratio (maybe some AI is used here to choose the focus point of the scene) 2. Add royalty-free…

Youtube doesn't want to stop things like this. It is only when studios get furious and go after Alphabet that they'll finally move to do something about it.

Re: Why is Warner Bros. Discovery putting old movies on YouTube?

#116

> Anyway, Waiting for Guffman still holds up, and you can watch it on YouTube, for free. On top of that it never was released outside of the US before! As a European fan of Spinal Tap I'm quite excited to finally be able to see this film. Also: no mention of The Mission, which is also in the list? That's quite a critically acclaimed one. Just look at these opening paragraphs from its wikipedia page: > The Mission is…

I discovered the Mission through an Ennio Morricone playlist, and didn't regret it. Not a religious person but it made me aware of who the Jesuits were and read up on them. Truly a fascinating part of the Catholic Church, they're like crack Navy Seals in religious terms, or 10x engineers of the Vatican :) I sometimes program whilst listening to "Gabriel's Oboe" on repeat for hours and hours https://www.youtube.com/wa…

What is the similarity between the Dominicans and the Jesuits?

Both were started to fight heresy: the Dominicans the Cathars, the Jesuits the Protestants. Both were started by soldiers. Both have unique spiritual disciplines.

What's the difference? Meet any Cathars lately?

Re: Why is Warner Bros. Discovery putting old movies on YouTube?

#117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Building a streaming service is pretty expensive.. It's not. At least not for companies of that size. There is PeerTube for that: https://joinpeertube.org/ . It can even decrease the load to your servers by spreading the trafic over peers.

Creating and running a (direct to consumer) profitable streaming service takes a lot more than just “infrastructure”.

[deleted]

Re: Why is Warner Bros. Discovery putting old movies on YouTube?

#119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Building a streaming service is pretty expensive.. It's not. At least not for companies of that size. There is PeerTube for that: https://joinpeertube.org/ . It can even decrease the load to your servers by spreading the trafic over peers.

Creating and running a (direct to consumer) profitable streaming service takes a lot more than just “infrastructure”.

Which problems are you expecting if you already have the content, the servers and the software? It's a famous company; people would definitely watch their movies for a small payment or with ads.

Re: Why is Warner Bros. Discovery putting old movies on YouTube?

#120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have a list of movies you can't find anywhere, not even for pay, not even on on obscure services. I check every once in a while to see if they pop up (JustWatch.us is great for this, IMDB is copying). Example: "Amateur" by Hal Hartley, though it's easy enough to buy copies on DVD. The problem is once the rights for a title end up in a library, the accessibility considerations operate at the library level, not the t…

> browningstreet 43 minutes ago | root | parent | next [–] I have a list of movies you can't find anywhere, not even for pay, not even on on obscure services. I check every once in a while to see if they pop up (JustWatch.us is great for this, IMDB is copying). Example: "Amateur" by Hal Hartley, though it's easy enough to buy copies on DVD. It IS available to stream! See https://www.halhartley.com/amateur

Tou-freakin'-che
Post reply on HN