My thoughts immediately go to all the queer kids in rural areas who stand to be cut off from the only support networks they have.
Any and all kids in rural areas. Experience deprivation is a very real thing. I grew up in a desolate rural area, circa the 1980s and 1990s. The Internet - WebChatBroadcasting, ICQ, IRC, etc - was like a gift from the gods in the early 1990s. Cutting off young teens from access to the world via 'social media,' is a human rights violation.
Australia: Kids under 16 to be banned from social media after Senate passes laws
111–120 of 498 posts
Re: Australia: Kids under 16 to be banned from social media after Senate passes laws
#112Re: Australia: Kids under 16 to be banned from social media after Senate passes laws
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Simply" If you're making money from aussie customers, you need to comply to aussie rules
How will the Australian government compel such companies to comply?
Yes VPNs blah blah. But it will be pretty hard to operate some rogue social site when you can’t sell any respectable ads besides maybe porn sites and malware, and are only accessible via VPN. Pretty high barrier to adoption for a brand new site.
Re: Australia: Kids under 16 to be banned from social media after Senate passes laws
#114My friend is a media lawyer in Australia He can’t even advise if some video game developers he represents’ multiplayer games are exempt from the ban He says the legislation is just an under defined word salad Note this was several days ago and it may have been amended in the mean time
Re: Australia: Kids under 16 to be banned from social media after Senate passes laws
#115I can’t get behind a ban because we’re fighting an unstoppable force: the connected future. This is the world we live in and kids will have to “evolve” to their new environment. I think parents and schools need to change the role they play.
It's not that I directly disagree, but honestly I don't think parents and schools have much of a fighting chance against companies like TikTok, SnapChat YouTube or Facebook. We need to create rules that prevent companies from employing addictive algorithms which locks users in cycles of endless mind numbing doom scrolling. Once the social media companies have changed their "algorithms" and recommendation engines or removed them entirely, then we can start talking about what parents and schools can do.
Re: Australia: Kids under 16 to be banned from social media after Senate passes laws
#116My thoughts immediately go to all the queer kids in rural areas who stand to be cut off from the only support networks they have.
Any and all kids in rural areas. Experience deprivation is a very real thing. I grew up in a desolate rural area, circa the 1980s and 1990s. The Internet - WebChatBroadcasting, ICQ, IRC, etc - was like a gift from the gods in the early 1990s. Cutting off young teens from access to the world via 'social media,' is a human rights violation.
Re: Australia: Kids under 16 to be banned from social media after Senate passes laws
#117I know this is targeting social media but just pointing out that there is no evidence screen time is affecting kids development and pretty solid evidence that it doesn't have much effect at all. https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/news-events/no-evidence-screen-time...
Re: Australia: Kids under 16 to be banned from social media after Senate passes laws
#118Re: Australia: Kids under 16 to be banned from social media after Senate passes laws
#119Re: Australia: Kids under 16 to be banned from social media after Senate passes laws
#120Make absolutely no mistake. The real reason why politicians push through these anti-social media laws is to prevent children from networking and discussing and sharing revolutionary ideas. These laws are designed to prevent generations from establishing a baseline sociopolitical coherency and unity. I was subject to a home firewall and computer use surveillance as a child for the exact same reason, because my cult gu…