Live data from Hacker News

What should a logo for NeXT look like? (1986)

paulrand.design

111–115 of 115 posts

Re: What should a logo for NeXT look like? (1986)

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I remember it looked terrible and unmemorable. Really, if you asked me 5 minutes ago to draw it I’d be unable to. I only remembered it was some sort of ugly use of the NeXT characters. Apparently people’s response to it is polarizing. I always thought it was a ridiculously bad logo.

the fact that you can even remember its shape and ugly colors is remarkable, considering this is a product that was never widely used and hasn't been sold since 1997

I didn’t remember its shape or colors. Did I say otherwise?

Re: What should a logo for NeXT look like? (1986)

#113

I might be in the minority, but the NeXT logo never looked good to me - there's something off with projection of the cube.

It is (almost) orthographic and people apparently expect perspective of some kind, or want to see a proper projection.

That is the cube clash as I see it.

Re: What should a logo for NeXT look like? (1986)

#114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe because it is an orthographic projection and not a perspective one.

I like orthographic projections, but this isn't one. The square at the top has perfect 90* corners, despite the "depth" (and thus being viewed from the side). Orthographic projections of a square squish it into a rhombus.

Good catch! Maybe that is the disconnect! I see close to ortho. Closer to ortho than it is anything else, but it just is not an ortho projection.

Re: What should a logo for NeXT look like? (1986)

#115
post #89
post #55

I miss my NeXTs so much. I really need to get another one. Love the UX/UI design and styling. The cases. The logo. Everything.

You can get a black MacBook and slap a NeXT logo sticker on it. It's more or less the same thing. Current macOS is a direct descendant of NEXTSTEP.

[dead]
Post reply on HN