What the damaged Svalbard cable looked like
111–120 of 264 posts
Re: What the damaged Svalbard cable looked like
#112> The critically important cable that connects Svalbard to the mainland is no thicker than a pinkie finger This is amazing. I wonder how much data per unit of time this is capable of transporting. Wikipedia says "Each segment has a speed of 10 gigabits per second (Gb/s), with a future potential capacity of 2,500 Gbit/s." [1] Wikipedia also notes that NASA helped fund this system. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sva…
Wait, an entire mainline for a country can do 10Gb/s and people somehow are paying for gigabit home Ethernet? Either the former is understated, or the latter is way overkill. Or, I'm misunderstanding. Which is probably the most likely possibility.
Re: What the damaged Svalbard cable looked like
#113Re: What the damaged Svalbard cable looked like
#114What, no mention that the Norwegian police use evidence markers with inches printed on them? That company sells them with CM markers.
Product appears to be an ID Tent from Evi-Paq. It has inches on the front 'leg' and cms on the rear. https://forensicssource.com/collections/evidence-markers/pro...
Re: What the damaged Svalbard cable looked like
#115What, no mention that the Norwegian police use evidence markers with inches printed on them? That company sells them with CM markers.
[flagged]
No. It's simply the _commercial product_ the police used for markers. It shows both cm and inches. You don't think that the police themselves are actually manufacturing these things, do you?
Re: What the damaged Svalbard cable looked like
#116The day before our arrival I receive a call that a boat somehow broke the water pipe which lies on the bottom between Rebak and Langkawi, cutting the island off from fresh water, and whether I wanted to rebook to another hotel.
Not sure what the moral of the story is, but it kinda fitted the context :)
Re: What the damaged Svalbard cable looked like
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
TL;DR of the court cases: the fisherman was guilty of damages to the tune of $1.2M, and his insurance cover was voided because his act was so reckless. Funnily enough, the cable owners (Telus) tried to thread the needle of making the owner liable, but not so badly that insurance wouldn't pay for it. The judge didn't buy this, and obviously a sole operator crab boat can't pay over a million in damages (although he did…
Despite not recovering any money, Telus may have seen some value in letting others know what the consequences can be. “Kill the chicken to scare the monkey
Re: What the damaged Svalbard cable looked like
#118> The critically important cable that connects Svalbard to the mainland is no thicker than a pinkie finger This is amazing. I wonder how much data per unit of time this is capable of transporting. Wikipedia says "Each segment has a speed of 10 gigabits per second (Gb/s), with a future potential capacity of 2,500 Gbit/s." [1] Wikipedia also notes that NASA helped fund this system. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sva…
> I wonder how much data per unit of time this is capable of transporting. The max throughput of fiber optic cables isn't exactly constant. As fiber optic modem and DSP technology improves you can get much higher speeds on 15+ year-old cables than were ever possible when they were laid. Recently I saw an article about researchers getting 300,000 Gbit/s over existing fiber optic cables (though I'm sure that's a long w…
Re: What the damaged Svalbard cable looked like
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
The photo with evidence marker 11 clearly shows both inches and centimeters. There's no conspiracy here. They're just taking photos with both sets of measurements.
Conspiracy was the furthest thing from my mind; I’ve seen photos from police in the US with centimeters and I thought it was hilarious: Americans using cm and Europeans using inches. What’s the world coming to?
Re: What the damaged Svalbard cable looked like
#120Earlier quoted context omitted.
That line of thinking ultimately leads to the conclusion that trust is impossible. If you cannot trust the Norwegian police to produce accurate information, then you must trust the media. If you can't trust the media, then you have to trust strangers on the Internet. If you can't trust strangers on the Internet, you have to trust your friends and family. But what if they're informed by the corrupt police, media, or I…
You're not making a logical argument against the reasoning, you're just saying that a logical argument, ignoring probability at every level, leaves you helpless. Trusting things isn't a solution, it's a cop-out. Instead of a magic formula, you take things on a case-by-case basis, examining sources and possible motives of those sources, looking at past experience with them for hints. This sounds like work because it i…