>>That the actual data was slated to be suppressed for 75 years for bullshit reasons
>https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/ you mean published quarterly
If you don't know what I'm talking about don't make shit up. This was a court proceeding in the US. Yes, people had to sue to get the trial data and again separately to get VAERS data. I forgot which one was supposed to be delayed 75 years (the original Pfizer trial I think) but in any case I remember the judge thought it unreasonable. In the end it was released. The list of possible side effects is huge and includes just about everything you can think of, perhaps by design.
>Which dictionary? Also, bear in mind that the dictionary isn't static. Its updated to reflect how english is spoken now, by the public.
You can google this easily. As for changing the definition, this vaccine didn't even stop death or infection as claimed. It at best "reduced" bad outcomes and that is negligible at best.
>Do you have data for that? what does it corrolate to? also depending on the country, some places its the younger that have less uptake.
No because this data is suppressed and never accurately reported. I think the CDC to this day hasn't made separate categories for "death/hospitalization with covid" and "death/hospitalization because of covid". Even when there is an incident, it's blamed on something else or even covid, because the vaccine does not prevent infection. At one point deaths among the vaccinated eclipsed deaths of unvaccinated, because of how many people were vaccinated (if nothing else).
>Do you know how exponentially harder it is to run it for 1000 people? How on earth, looking at how shit the US government is at functioning, can they organise something like that?
First of all, the truth has largely come out about all the major alleged conspiracy theories. The conspiracy theorists were right about: the lab leak, biowarfare research, gain of function research, Fauci lying and intimidating his subordinates to suppress the truth, and the fact that the vaccines don't stop the spread of covid or even slow it. They were also right about side effects and attempted suppression of trial and VAERS data.
Second of all, are you suggesting it is impossible for a large group to conspire to do something, or that crimes can be ongoing even as the public is aware of it? All they have to do to shut it down is call you names and censor you, get you fired, and so on. This has happened to people over the vaccine vs. their basic human rights, don't forget.
If all that needed to be done to halt crimes of that scale is make them public, we would not live under the constant state surveillance that we do today, because Snowden exposed all that.
>Moreover, if its the "MSM", who are holding the secrets, do you know how fucking chatty those pricks are? (I used to work for a finance newspaper) All you have to do is take them to the pub and you can find out who's doing what illegal shit. or whos flogging synthetic opioids to the rust belt
I don't have this personal experience but there have been whistleblowers and even hidden camera exposés on a lot of this shit. James O'Keefe had a big undercover interview with a Pfizer employee, and not long after the board of his nonprofit went rogue and sunk the whole thing. He is still fighting them in court. No doubt they were all bought by Big Pharma or something, because it makes no sense otherwise.
Look at the Boeing situation. 2 whistleblowers dead within weeks of each other, and 10 more living in fear. And that's not even the government or the richest company around. Even though Boeing has been exposed, they haven't made any major changes yet.