Live data from Hacker News

Winamp has announced that it is "opening up" its source code

about.winamp.com

111–120 of 175 posts

Re: Winamp has announced that it is "opening up" its source code

#111
post #13
post #2

Good. Love the reimplementation in HTML https://webamp.org/

It's fantastic. I can easily spend hours on the skins website. https://skins.webamp.org/

Major Tom was the one with the most impressive artwork to me.

https://skins.webamp.org/skin/dd9931b75c11c570ff8ceabee499e7...

Re: Winamp has announced that it is "opening up" its source code

#112
post #4

I'm skeptical this will be a fully free license based on the cagey language in the announcement :/

They might not be in a position to relicense all of it, or might not be sure of exactly how to do so appropriately.

Large, living companies like Microsoft can work with their lawyers to confidently understand what they're releasing when opening up old code and indemnify theythemselves appropriately, but a troubled company on its last legs can't nexessarily budget for all that.

Commercial software of that vintage was not built from dependencies that were all open source themselves, nor were there necessarily contributor/contractor agreements that kept copyright in a suitable place for open source relicencing. They might have been prepared for explicit rights transfer to another party, and maybe disclosure as they're suggesting here, but relicensing is a different thing.

Re: Winamp has announced that it is "opening up" its source code

#115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(Borland) Delphi also made creating non standard form shapes; the secret was in leveraging the win32 api, which was really easy to do in Delphi. Here's an example: http://www.delphicorner.f9.co.uk/articles/forms4.htm

Strange that they didn't include a single screenshot on that page.

Screenshots might take 10’s of kibibytes. Not very baud efficient. Use the webring links at the bottom of the page to find another website that has pictures. Sign their guestbook as thanks.

Re: Winamp has announced that it is "opening up" its source code

#116
post #56

Some context: Winamp's owners have been going through financial difficulties since last year and as a result have laid off the skeleton crew they previously had maintaining Winamp (their main focus seems to be a streaming service also called Winamp for HTML5 and phones). This looks like they're willing to let the community take over maintenance for PC Winamp, which beats letting it die IMO. https://forums.winamp.com/…

Still waiting on KaZaA open source. Kids these days don't know what it's like trying to download a music video and end up watching someone getting beheaded.

Or downloading Windows XP.ISO and booting up Ubuntu. 15 year old me was confused and enraged.

Re: Winamp has announced that it is "opening up" its source code

#117
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With the source code someone can port it to make Linamp.

don't forget Macamp.

Actually yeah I had forgotten about that alpha version awkwardly called “Winamp:Mac” because “MacAMP” was already taken by not-Nullsoft https://macintoshgarden.org/apps/winampmac https://macintoshgarden.org/apps/macamp-10-preview-edition

And the Android version which I used briefly around 2010 before getting into Subsonic/D-Sub https://forums.winamp.com/forum/winamp/winamp-for-android/29...

Re: Winamp has announced that it is "opening up" its source code

#119
It's amazing… how WinAmp and the other softwares and websites that were so crucial in the rise of the internet AND computers in general, just..faded away like they did, and we got stuck with the Facebook and TikTok and Twitter and Netflix etc bs we have left today..

Re: Winamp has announced that it is "opening up" its source code

#120
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

foobar2000 has been my go-to player on both Windows and Mac for about a decade now. Particularly, I like the dense (yet uncluttered) interface and functionality I take for granted, like selecting a dozen files and editing metadata all at once. A few of my friends complain that the layout "sucks" or foobar lacks functionality they need, but for my use case, it's in a Goldilocks state. With that said, for people used t…

> A few of my friends complain that the layout "sucks" or foobar lacks functionality they need, but for my use case, I see these complaints too, and I find them funny. The layout is what you make of it. I don't care for any of the layout presets presented in the "Quick Appearance Setup" dialog, but the default UI component is very easy to customize almost any way you want. There's even a scratchbox feature that lets…

to be fair, it's a lot easier to tell if you do or do not like something than it is to design something you do like. I run into that with vim colorschemes all the time
Post reply on HN