Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Like all dietary/nutrition sciences there are plenty of studies for both sides of arguments (e.g. coffee is healthy/unhealthy, eggs are healthy/unhealthy), so you can easily find studies that contradict the benefits of bacteria in raw milk (certainly there is a potential safety risk) Apparently not, as per the study you linked to. "To our knowledge, there are no studies exploring the impact of unpasteurised milk in…
> Apparently not, as per the study you linked to. Follow the logic for the specific examples I gave, you will find studies where eggs are healthy/unhealthy and coffee is healthy/unhealthy I provided a study that concluded there’s an association between raw milk and microbiome health resulting in positive physical/mental outcomes. You clearly asked in bad faith, as I said generally raw milk is nutrient dense a signifi…
Asking someone to a follow up for a statement of fact is not bad faith, and saying that it is, is just an attempt to shift me into some kind of villain so you get an escape hatch.
If you don't know what they are, say that. But to google a study that you don't bother to read and get super defensive when confronted about the fact that it is meaningless is childish.