Live data from Hacker News

Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code

cnn.com

111–120 of 247 posts

Re: Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code

#111
post #4

They buried the lede: Even if the driving mutation identified in the study could be undone, “it still wouldn’t bring back the tail.” Oh well.

So close!

The greatest thing on this thread is how disappointed we all are for some bizarre reason lol. It would be cool to get them back for better balance.

Re: Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code

#112
post #4

They buried the lede: Even if the driving mutation identified in the study could be undone, “it still wouldn’t bring back the tail.” Oh well.

So I’m guessing this is less like, “we found the flag that toggles tail production” and more “we found a chunk of code that belongs to tail production”? The first bit of the article sure makes it sound like this DNA is what does it all.

We found the flag that toggled tail production, but the tail production code is no longer in the codebase so turning on the flag again wouldn't do anything anymore.

Re: Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code

#114
post #110
post #101

time to bring it back then, alongside horn implants, and third tit.

How about a third eye? "The parietal eye is found in the tuatara, most lizards, frogs, salamanders, certain bony fish, sharks, and lampreys...It is absent in mammals, but was present in their closest extinct relatives, the therapsids" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parietal_eye You may wish to consult your pineal gland.

wings

Re: Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code

#116
post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So I’m guessing this is less like, “we found the flag that toggles tail production” and more “we found a chunk of code that belongs to tail production”? The first bit of the article sure makes it sound like this DNA is what does it all.

We found the flag that toggled tail production, but the tail production code is no longer in the codebase so turning on the flag again wouldn't do anything anymore.

The code might still be there, but there are no tests for it, there have been millions of years of spaghetti code refactoring in between, and there aren't even any checksums on the storage to verify data integrity.

Re: Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code

#117
post #110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How about a third eye? "The parietal eye is found in the tuatara, most lizards, frogs, salamanders, certain bony fish, sharks, and lampreys...It is absent in mammals, but was present in their closest extinct relatives, the therapsids" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parietal_eye You may wish to consult your pineal gland.

wings

It's not all it's cracked up to be - https://craphound.com/someone/Cory_Doctorow_-_Someone_Comes_...

Re: Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code

#118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem might be size, lots of smaller primates have tails which can be very useful as a fifth arm for holding onto branches. As you get larger, tree foraging becomes less viable and the tail less useful and it would need to be oversized to be able to function properly.

Most of animals don't use tails as a fifth arm. My cat seems to use it for extra balance. I think that humans could do that as well.

Mine used to use it to tickle my nostrils and make me sneeze for its own amusement when standing or walking over my lap.
Post reply on HN